Scenario: A development team is tasked with building a high-security payment gateway. To ensure the codebase is resilient and maintainable over the long term, the lead architect mandates pair programming for all critical modules.How does this practice primarily contribute to the resilience of the codebase in this scenario?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Pair programming promotes continuous knowledge transfer and shared ownership, which directly strengthens a codebase’s resilience.

1) Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Pair programming: two developers work together on the same code (driver and navigator), providing real-time review and discussion.
- Bus factor (key-person risk): the number of people who must be lost before a project is critically affected; higher bus factor = lower risk.
- Resilience and maintainability: ability to survive personnel changes, quickly fix bugs, and evolve safely over time.
- Security-critical code benefits from multiple eyes and consensus on design/implementation.

2) Step-by-step reasoning
- When two developers collaborate on a critical module, both absorb design decisions, rationale, edge cases, and implementation details.
- This duplication of knowledge increases the effective bus factor: if one person becomes unavailable, others can step in.
- Real-time pairing catches logic errors, design inconsistencies, and potential security issues earlier than solo work, reducing defect density.
- Shared understanding leads to consistent coding patterns and easier onboarding, which improves maintainability and long-term resilience of the payment gateway.

3) (No numeric calculations apply; reasoning above shows logical progression and effect magnitudes.)

4) Why the correct answer is correct
- Option b explicitly states the outcome produced by pairing: a shared understanding and reduced reliance on any single expert. That is the primary resilience benefit because it decreases single-point-of-failure risk and enables more people to maintain and secure critical modules.

5) Why the other options are incorrect
- a: Incorrect — pair programming is not intended to centralize work to only senior developers; that would reduce knowledge spread and increase risk.
- c: Incorrect — pair programming does not discourage accountability; it promotes collective ownership while maintaining shared responsibility for quality.
- d: Incorrect — pair programming reduces “code silos” by distributing knowledge across the team, rather than creating sections understood only by specific pairs.

6) Conclusion
The primary contribution of mandated pair programming in this scenario is captured by option b: it fosters shared understanding and reduces reliance on any single individual. This matches the provided correct answer.

类似问题

Question 28

What is a key mindset that contributes to successful pair programming?

A potential pitfall to avoid in pair programming is:

A project has a required return of 12.6 percent, an initial cash outflow of $42,100, and cash inflows of $16,500 in Year 1, $11,700 in Year 2, and $10,400 in Year 4. What is the net present value?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单