Based on facts from class, is fertilizing oceans is a good way of reducing atmospheric CO2 produced by human-related activities?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks whether fertilizing oceans is a good strategy to reduce atmospheric CO2 from human activities, based on class facts.

Option 1: 'No, with acidification and loss of biodiversity, opportunistic species could grow exponentially causing imbalance of the food web.' This answer captures the core concern: nutrient fertilization in oceans can trigger eutrophication-like effects, fuel algal blooms, acidify surface waters, and disrupt community structure by favoring fast-growing or invasive species. Such shifts threaten biodiversity and can destabilize food webs, which is why this option identifies real ecological risks.

Option 2: 'Yes, because that means higher biodiversity.' This is misleading. Adding nutrients to the ocean does not guarantee higher biodiversity; it often reduces it by promoting blooms of a few species that outcompete others, leading to monocultures or harmful algal blooms and a net loss of species diversity.

Option 3: 'Yes, because more living things means more ecological balance.' While on the surface more life might seem beneficial, nutrient fertilization tends to disrupt balance rather than create it. It can cause oxygen depletion when blooms die and decompose, create dead zones, and alter nutrient cycles in ways that destabilize ecosystems, not improve balance.

Option 4: 'No, carbon doesn't move out of the atmosphere into aquatic systems.' This statement is factually inaccurate. Carbon does move between the atmosphere and oceans via gas exchange; CO2 dissolves in seawater, and biological processes can transfer carbon into marine ecosystems. While this transfer is real, fertilizing oceans is not a proven or safe method to meaningfully reduce atmospheric CO2 and carries ecological risks highlighted in Option 1.

In summary, the statement in Option 1 correctly reflects the environmental risks associated with ocean fertilization, whereas Options 2 and 3 misstate potential outcomes by assuming universally positive effects on biodiversity and balance, and Option 4 incorrectly claims the atmospheric-ocean carbon exchange is not a factor at all.

Based on facts from class, is fertilizing oceans is a good way of reducing atmospheric CO2 produced by human-related activities?单项选择题

类似问题

Imagine for a moment that you will be the person that makes the final decision to fund fertilizing the world's oceans with Iron. Would you decide to implement or not implement this practice. (Yes it is worth 0 points).

You own a bond that pays $64 in interest annually. The face value is $1,000 and the current market price is $1,021.61. The bond matures in 11 years. What is the yield to maturity?

Which of the following statements is CORRECT?

It will cost $9,600 to acquire an ice cream cart that is expected to produce cash inflows of $3,600 a year for three years. After the three years, the cart is expected to be worthless. What is the payback period?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单