The quadratic version of the regression showing the effect of advertising on quantity in the textbook is q = 3.95 + 1.2A – 0.04A2.

For this regression, what evidence would you consider in deciding whether the quadratic specification is preferable to the linear specification?

Question

The quadratic version of the regression showing the effect of advertising on quantity in the textbook is q = 3.95 + 1.2A – 0.04A2.

For this regression, what evidence would you consider in deciding whether the quadratic specification is preferable to the linear specification?

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

To assess whether the quadratic specification is preferable to the linear one, we should evaluate evidence about the squared term and overall model fit from the quadratic regression.
Option 1: 'The magnitude of the coefficient on the squared term is non-zero.' While a non-zero coefficient suggests that the squared term matters, statistical usefulness requires evidence that it is significantly different from zero rather than just non-zero due to sampling variation. So this alone does not establish statistical significance or superiority of the quadratic form.
Option 2: 'The t-statistic on the squared term in the quadratic regression is large enough in magnitude.' This is the key statistical criterion for whether the squared term meaningfully contributes to explaining the dependent variable beyond chance. A large absolute t-statistic (and thus a small p-value) indicates the squared term is statistically significant, supporting the quadratic specification.
Option 3: 'The coefficient on the squared term is small compared to the coefficient on the linear term.' A small relative size by itself does not determine whether the quadratic term is important. Significance depends on its standard error and whether it is statistically different from zero, not just its absolute magnitude relative to the linear term. Moreover, even a small coefficient can be significant if its standard error is tiny, and the squared term can still improve fit.
Option 4: 'All of these responses are correct.' Since the previous two points are not both correct and the third point is not a sufficient criterion, this option overstates what evidence is necessary. The correct assessment relies on statistical significance of the squared term rather than merely non-zero magnitude or relative size.
In summary, the essential evidence to prefer the quadratic specification is that the squared term's t-statistic is large in magnitude, indicating a substantial and statistically reliable contribution beyond the linear term.

The quadratic version of the regression showing the effect of advertising on quantity in the textbook is q = 3.95 + 1.2A – 0.04A2. For this regression, what evidence would you consider in deciding whether the quadratic specification is preferable to the linear specification? 单项选择题

类似问题

Which one of the following is NOT one of the 4 specification criteria for determining whether a given variable belongs in a regression equation?

Which test is specifically designed as a general test for functional form misspecification in a regression model?

Another problem is that the European Union has expanded, and the model you used did not account for the expansion of the European Union during the year. This contributed to which problem?

Which of the following statements is correct?

You own a bond that pays $64 in interest annually. The face value is $1,000 and the current market price is $1,021.61. The bond matures in 11 years. What is the yield to maturity?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单