Question textYour research and development team are studying several compounds that interact with receptors of the autonomic nervous system. You have carried out a series of competition radioligand binding assays. The results are shown below. If your team was looking for a compound that targets muscarinic receptors in particular, which one of these compounds would be your BEST choice to investigate further? Multiple choice 1 Question 2LOL11LOL22LOL33LOL44 The above IC50 values for each compound provide a measure of its __________________ at each receptor tested. Multiple choice 2 Question 2concentration required to cause 50% of the compound’s maximum effectaffinityconcentration required to inhibit 50% of an agonist’s maximum effectantagonist potency

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

IC50 in a competition radioligand binding assay is the concentration of a test compound that displaces 50% of a radiolabelled ligand from a receptor; lower IC50 values therefore indicate stronger binding (higher affinity) for that receptor.

1) Relevant concepts
- IC50: concentration that inhibits 50% of specific binding in a competition assay.
- Affinity: how tightly a ligand binds a receptor; inversely related to IC50 (all else equal).
- Cheng–Prusoff relation (links IC50 to Ki, a true affinity constant): Ki = IC50 / (1 + [radioligand]/Kd).

2) Step-by-step reasoning using the table (M3 column)
- Extract M3 IC50s: LOL11 = 250 μM, LOL22 = 50 μM, LOL33 = 5 μM, LOL44 = 0.01 μM.
- The compound with the smallest IC50 at M3 binds most tightly (highest affinity) to M3. Compare numerically:
  - LOL33 / LOL44 = 5 / 0.01 = 500 → LOL33 is 500-fold weaker than LOL44 at M3.
  - LOL22 / LOL44 = 50 / 0.01 = 5000 → LOL22 is 5,000-fold weaker.
  - LOL11 / LOL44 = 250 / 0.01 = 25,000 → LOL11 is 25,000-fold weaker.
- Therefore LOL44 has by far the lowest IC50 at M3 and is the best candidate to target muscarinic (M3) receptors.

3) Calculations / intermediate steps shown above (simple ratios demonstrating fold differences).

4) Why the correct answer is correct
- Because a lower IC50 in a competitive binding assay indicates a higher affinity for that receptor, LOL44 (0.01 μM at M3) is the best choice to investigate for muscarinic selectivity.

5) Why other multiple-choice options are incorrect
- LOL11, LOL22, LOL33 all have much higher IC50s at M3 and therefore lower affinity for M3 than LOL44.
- For the second blank: the IC50 values measure affinity (or are used to estimate affinity/Ki). They do not directly indicate EC50 (concentration for 50% of a compound’s maximal effect), nor specifically “concentration required to inhibit 50% of an agonist’s maximum effect” (that describes an inhibition of response), nor simply “antagonist potency” without clarifying binding/functional context.

6) Conclusion
- The best compound to pursue for muscarinic (M3) targeting is LOL44, and the IC50 values provide a measure of affinity — matching the provided answers: LOL44 and affinity.

类似问题

An experiment was carried out to determine the Kd (equilibrium dissociation constant) values of two newly developed ligands at the same receptor target. Drug C: Kd = 0.8μM Drug D: Kd = 8nM Based on this information, it could be concluded that at this receptor, Drug C:

An experiment was carried out to determine the Kd (equilibrium dissociation constant) values of two newly developed ligands at the same receptor target. Drug M: Kd = 85nM Drug P: Kd = 2μM Based on this information, it could be concluded that at this receptor, Drug M:

A project has a required return of 12.6 percent, an initial cash outflow of $42,100, and cash inflows of $16,500 in Year 1, $11,700 in Year 2, and $10,400 in Year 4. What is the net present value?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单