Judge Jones is reviewing a cyberbullying case in her courtroom. When Judge Jones rules, in her pronouncement of the case, she discusses the law along with the importance of social conditions behind her ruling. She also is parting from past precedents in order to follow societal values in regards to cyberbullying. Judge Jones is using which school of jurisprudence?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Legal realism emphasizes that judges should consider social interests, real-world consequences, and policy when interpreting and applying the law, so it fits this scenario.

1. Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Legal realism: Law is not only rules; judges interpret law in light of social facts, policy goals, and practical effects. It permits departure from strict precedent when social conditions demand change.  
- Legal positivism: Law is what the sovereign enacts; validity depends on sources (statutes, regulations), separate from morality or social policy.  
- Natural law: Law derives from moral principles or universal justice; decisions follow moral truth rather than pragmatic social analysis.  
- Historical school of law: Focuses on legal development through tradition and precedent (the “spirit of the people” over time), favoring continuity.  
- Stare decisis: The doctrine of following precedent to ensure stability and predictability.

2. Step-by-step reasoning
- The judge explicitly discusses the law together with the importance of social conditions behind her ruling. That emphasis on social context aligns with legal realism’s core: law should respond to social realities.  
- The judge is departing from past precedents to follow contemporary societal values. Legal realism accepts that strict adherence to precedent is not always appropriate when social interests or consequences warrant a different outcome.  
- Combining the two behaviors — reliance on social conditions and willingness to override precedent for policy reasons — matches legal realism rather than the other schools.

3. Intermediate logical steps
- If a judge focuses on social conditions and policy effects → points to legal realism.  
- If a judge departs from precedent to reflect societal values → inconsistent with stare decisis and historical school, consistent with legal realism.

4. Why the correct answer is correct
Legal realism explicitly legitimizes judicial decisions grounded in social context and practical consequences; thus Judge Jones’s approach—integrating social conditions and discarding precedent to reflect modern values—is textbook legal realism.

5. Why other options are incorrect
- Legal positivism: Would prioritize statute/source-based reasoning, not social conditions.  
- Natural law: Would appeal to universal morality, not pragmatic social policy.  
- Historical school: Emphasizes continuity and precedent, opposite of departing from past rulings.  
- Stare decisis: Is the practice of following precedent; Judge Jones departs from it.

6. Conclusion
The correct answer is D) Legal realism, which matches the provided answer.

类似问题

The laws that previously held homosexuality as illegal were struck down because courts recognized the changes in society's views on homosexuality and homosexual marriages. The school of thought that best fits the laws prohibiting discrimination is known as Blank ______.

When the Supreme Court made its ruling on the legality of homosexual marriage, they considered social and economic conditions surrounding marriage rather than relying on precedent alone. This was an example of:

A project has a required return of 12.6 percent, an initial cash outflow of $42,100, and cash inflows of $16,500 in Year 1, $11,700 in Year 2, and $10,400 in Year 4. What is the net present value?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单