According to the Nunberg (1999) article, which of the following is true about the immigrants to the US and their relationship to English?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks about what Nunberg (1999) reports regarding immigrants to the US and their relationship to English. Here are the options analyzed one by one:

Option 1: 'They are learning English faster than immigrants in the past did.' This statement aligns with a common finding attributed to contemporary research: newer immigrant groups often show relatively rapid adoption of English compared to earlier waves, reflecting changing social, educational, and policy environments that facilitate English acquisition. It captures a trend toward quicker English learning as integration progresses, and this is a plausible interpretation of Nunberg’s discussion on language assimilation and immigrant adaptation.

Option 2: 'Attitude surveys suggest they are generally not willing to learn English.' If this were accurate, it would imply a widespread unwillingness to learn English across immigrant groups. However, Nunberg’s analysis typically emphasizes exposure, practical incentives, and structural factors that encourage English learning, rather than a broad, uniform resistance. Moreover, attitude surveys often reveal nuanced views rather than a blanket unwillingness, making this option less consistent with the nuanced picture Nunberg presents.

Option 3: 'They are generally more concerned with preserving their first language than with learning English.' This suggests a strong, overarching emphasis on native-language maintenance at the expense of English acquisition. While language maintenance is a real consideration for some communities, Nunberg's article usually discusses English learning as a salient outcome of integration processes, and it does not claim that preservation of the first language universally dominates over learning English for all immigrants. Therefore, this option overstates a single priority across diverse groups.

Option 4: 'They are supportive of English-only policies because of the benefits it would provide them with.' This asserts a broad support for English-only policies among immigrants based on self-interested perceived benefits. Nunberg’s work on language use and policy tends to treat immigrants as navigating a complex set of incentives and constraints, and it typically does not portray a universal endorsement of English-only measures by immigrants themselves. Thus, this option misunderstands the diverse attitudes toward language policy among immigrant communities.

In summary, the first option best captures a plausible, evidence-informed trend discussed by Nunberg: that contemporary immigrants are learning English at a rate faster than in the past, reflecting changes in social context, education, and policy that facilitate language acquisition.

According to the Nunberg (1999) article, which of the following is true about the immigrants to the US and their relationship to English?单项选择题

类似问题

When evaluating a new project, firms should include in the projected cash flows all of the following EXCEPT:

Provide the best rationale for what's wrong with supply chains today?

What is Blockchain and how is it relevant to supply chain management?

Why aren't most products today recycled and/or reused?

What can be said about Two Tier vs. Three Tier distribution?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单