Which of the following has been proposed as a limitation of the materials of Fitch and Hauser (2004)?单项选择题

题目图片
A

a. The materials of Fitch and Hauser (2004) do not actually represent finite state grammar learning

B

b. The materials of Fitch and Hauser (2004) do not actually represent faculty of language broad

C

c. The materials of Fitch and Hauser (2004) do not actually represent autonomy of syntax

D

d. The materials of Fitch and Hauser (2004) do not actually represent derivational complexity

登录即可查看完整答案

我们收录了全球超50000道真实原题与详细解析,现在登录,立即获得答案。

类似问题

One piece of evidence that supports the nativist view of language development is

You get into an argument (in a friendly way) with some of your friends at a party. They say that language learning is just like learning any other kind of information, but you want to argue that at least some aspects of language learning are innate, in the sense that we are born with certain special abilities to hear, learn, and even (among groups of people) to create new languages. No-one really ‘knows’ the right answer here, but what kinds of evidence could you point to that potentially support the innateness argument? Select all that apply.

You're having a friendly argument with some friends at a party about whether language is in a certain sense 'innate' to all humans. They think it's not, because it's 'obviously learned'. You decide to argue that, while many aspects of each language must indeed be learned, in certain important ways it is still true that the capacity to not only learn but even create a language is innate in all of us, at least as children. What evidence can you point to? Select ALL of the points below that support the argument that language is in certain ways innate.

Which of the following is correct about language deprivation in children?

更多留学生实用工具

加入我们，立即解锁 海量真题 与 独家解析，让复习快人一步！