The German apprenticeship system, where firms invest heavily in training workers who could potentially leave, survives because:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Institutional arrangements — coordinated training standards, employment protections that reduce turnover, and compressed wage structures — collectively reduce the risk that trained workers are hired away.

1) Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Training externality / hold-up problem: when a firm pays for training, other firms can poach the trained worker and capture returns, discouraging investment in training.
- General vs. firm-specific skills: general skills are valuable to many employers (more poaching risk); firm-specific skills are valuable mainly to the training firm (less poaching risk).
- Institutional mechanisms: coordinated curricula/certifications, labor market regulations, wage structures, and employer networks can change incentives and reduce poaching.

2) Step-by-step reasoning
- In Germany’s dual apprenticeship system firms invest in substantial training that includes occupation-specific skills. Left unchecked, poaching would make such investment unprofitable.
- Coordinated training standards (industry-recognized qualifications and shared curricula) reduce uncertainty about the value of training and allow multiple employers to accept a common credential; they also encourage cost-sharing across firms and sectors and create norms against opportunistic hiring.
- Employment protections and strong industry-firm-worker relationships lower turnover and make long-term employment more likely, enabling firms to recoup training costs over time.
- Compressed wage structures and seniority-based pay reduce short-run wage differentials that external poachers could use to lure apprentices away immediately after training.
- Together these institutions mitigate the hold-up problem, align incentives for firms to train, and sustain extensive apprenticeship investment.

3) Calculations / intermediates
- (No numerical calculation required; reasoning is institutional/economic.)

4) Why the correct answer is correct
- The chosen option identifies the combination of coordinated standards, employment protections, and wage structures as the mechanisms that reduce the risk of losing trained workers and thus sustain heavy employer investment.

5) Why the other options are incorrect
- Option 1 (a 10-year legal prohibition) is false; no such blanket prohibition exists and would be legally and practically infeasible.
- Option 2 (apprenticeships teach only general skills) is incorrect; apprenticeships include many occupation- and firm-relevant skills and the system’s value relies on these recognized qualifications.
- Option 3 (government fully reimburses training costs) is incorrect; German firms bear much of the training costs, not full government reimbursement.

Conclusion: The institutional arrangements option is correct and matches the provided answer.

The German apprenticeship system, where firms invest heavily in training workers who could potentially leave, survives because:单项选择题

类似问题

The introduction of globalization effects labor costs by doing all of the following except:

In the context of labor force participation, educated women are Blank ______.

Question 6.45 Choose the correct answerRead the following statements regarding the labour discipline model and select the correct one.

Question 3.22 Choose the correct answerIn the period before 1870, in Britain both wages and hours worked rose, while in the 20th century, working hours fell even though wages continued to rise. Based on this information, read the following statements and select the correct one.

Question 3.25 Choose the correct answerRead the following statements and select the one that is correct regarding hours of work and income.

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单