Since Kant thinks that marriage is the only context in which sexual relations are not immoral, he thinks that polygamy is unacceptable.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question presents a specific claim about Kant's view on sexual morality within marriage and polygamy. 
Option A: "can't tell from the text" — This suggests the text provided does not contain enough information to determine Kant's position. To evaluate this, one would need to know whether the source explicitly discusses polygamy or restricts sexual relations to monogamous marriage. If the text is silent on polygamy or on whether marriage is the sole permissible context for non-moral disapproval, then this option could be considered. However, if the text makes a claim about Kant’s view on marriage and sexuality, the implication may be stronger than a mere silence, which would push one toward other options. 
Option B: "false" — Choosing this would assert that the statement given is incorrect. To argue this, you would need to show that Kant does not think marriage is the only legitimate context for sexual relations or that polygamy is not necessarily immoral in his view. This would involve demonstrating either a broader or a more nuanced account in Kant where forms of marriage beyond monogamy could be permissible or where sexual conduct outside of marriage might be morally permissible under certain universalizable maxims. 
Option C: "true" — Selecting this would align with the reading that Kant treats marriage as the sole legitimate context for sexual relations and that polygamy is therefore immoral. Support for this would point to Kant’s emphasis on the monogamous union as a canonical institution that respects the dignity of persons and the fidelity required by the categorical imperative, suggesting that multiple simultaneous relationships undermine the universality and end-assessment central to Kantian ethics. It would involve arguing that a polygyamous arrangement cannot be universalized without contradiction and would fail to treat partners as ends in themselves within a single, exclusive contract. 
In weighing the options, consider what Kant's explicit writings (e.g., on marriage as a legal and moral contract, the need to treat persons as ends, and the role of fidelity in intimate relations) imply about exclusivity and the moral status of polygamy. If the text clearly aligns with a monogamous framework and frames polygamy as incompatible with Kantian ethics, option C would be supported. If the text is ambiguous or silent about polygamy or offers a broader view of permissible sexual contexts, option A or B might be more appropriate depending on the precise wording and context given. The key is to assess whether the claim about Kant’s stance is directly supported, contradicted, or left undetermined by the material provided. 
Note: The reasoning above treats each option as a separate pathway of interpretation and highlights how Kantian principles would be used to justify or challenge the claim, without assuming a definitive answer from the prompt alone.

Since Kant thinks that marriage is the only context in which sexual relations are not immoral, he thinks that polygamy is unacceptable. 单项选择题

类似问题

Which of the following is NOT one of Kant’s deontological tests?

Which of the following is similar to Kant's categorical imperative?

Kant believes that as long as you do the right thing, it does not matter what your reasons were.

Kant argues that incest is not immoral in all cases.

In Kant's theory, a maxim is

What is a hypothetical imperative, according to Kant?

10. According to Kant, helping your elderly patient walk to the front desk after treatment is a(n):

What is Kant's categorical imperative?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单