The political action surrounding the issue of GMO rice being grown in California, can best be described as having

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks about the nature of the political action surrounding GMO rice in California and provides four descriptive pairings of costs and benefits. We will evaluate each option in turn to understand the reasoning behind which characterization fits best.
Option A: 'concentrated costs and widely dispersed benefits.' This suggests that a small group bears the costs (e.g., farmers or affected residents) while a broad, diffuse public enjoys the benefits. In many political economy analyses of GMO crops, benefits can be dispersed (consumers, exporters, biotech firms) and costs may also be dispersed or concentrated depending on the specific policy, but when the issue centers on a highly debated technology with strong organized interests, the costs to a particular group (such as farmers facing labeling, regulation, or coexistence requirements) can be concentrated. However, this framing may not capture the commonly emphasized dynamic of both costs and benefits being felt unevenly but strongly by specific groups, so it is not the strongest overall fit for the described scenario.
Option B: 'widely dispersed costs and widely dispersed benefits.' This implies that both costs and benefits are spread across the population with no particular concentration. In real-world GMO policy battles, while there are broad implications, there are typically notable concentration of costs or benefits among certain stakeholders (farmers, biotech companies, environmental groups, consumers in certain regions). Thus this option underplays the force and organization often seen in such political action and is less accurate for modeling the typical political dynamic of GMO rice debates in a state like California.
Option C: 'concentrated costs and concentrated benefits.' This wording indicates that a small, identifiable group bears the costs while another small, identifiable group gains the benefits. In the GMO rice controversy, it is common to see well-organized interest groups (e.g., biotech industry, certain farmer groups, consumer advocates) that both resist or promote policies, creating a situation where both costs and benefits are felt intensely by particular groups rather than being broadly shared. This option aligns with the classic political economy observation that policy issues with high controversy can generate concentrated effects on specific actors. This makes it a plausible and coherent description of the situation.
Option D: 'widely dispersed costs and concentrated benefits.' This would mean most people incur costs, but only a narrow set of groups gains; while occasionally some benefits might be concentrated (e.g., profits to agribusiness), the GMO rice issue often involves cost imposition on farmers or local communities through regulation, coexistence costs, or labeling burdens, while benefits (like consumer access to products or market gains) can be more dispersed. Overall, this framing does not consistently capture the typical imbalance where both costs and benefits tend to cluster around particular actors in policy battles over GMO crops, making it less accurate.
In summary, the reasoning across options reflects how political action around contested technologies often features uneven distribution of impacts, with some options mischaracterizing the concentration patterns. The pattern described in option C—concentrated costs and concentrated benefits—best captures the idea that distinct groups experience the policy effects in a focused way, though we should acknowledge that real-world situations can exhibit variations across cases and time.

The political action surrounding the issue of GMO rice being grown in California, can best be described as having单项选择题

类似问题

Traditionally, business organizations have been most supportive of

Pluralism requires

Technology advances have given a boost to public interest groups.

For any particular special interest group, lobbying over a specific political issue will likely be successful when the issue is classified as

Name the Supreme Court decision that removed financial constraints on PACs.

Political scientists Joshua Kalla and David Broockman find that senior policy makers made themselves available to _____ between three and four times more often than they did to constituents.

Name the political scientist who argues that parties are designed to serve the needs of ambitious politicians (namely candidates and officeholders).

Name the political scientist who said this famous quote about the problems of pluralism: “The flaw in the pluralist heaven is that the heavenly choir sings with a strong upper-class accent.”

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单