Kettle Chips suspects that a machine which fills packets of 175g Sea Salt Chips may be wrongly calibrated and over-filling. A quality control manager takes a random sample of 100 packets and calculates the mean content to be 176g with a standard deviation of 5g. You want to find whether there is evidence that the machine is overfilling packets.

What are your hypotheses?

Question

Kettle Chips suspects that a machine which fills packets of 175g Sea Salt Chips may be wrongly calibrated and over-filling. A quality control manager takes a random sample of 100 packets and calculates the mean content to be 176g with a standard deviation of 5g. You want to find whether there is evidence that the machine is overfilling packets.

What are your hypotheses?

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Since the suspicion is over-filling, the alternative hypothesis must state that the true mean packet content exceeds 175 g (μ > 175). 1. Relevant knowledge points and concepts - Parameter of interest: the population mean μ (average content per packet). - Null hypothesis (H0): the assumption of no effect or no overfill; typically takes an equality form. - Alternative hypothesis (H1): expresses the suspected direction (one-sided if we suspect overfilling). - For large samples, the sampling distribution of the sample mean is approximately normal with standard error SE = s/√n. 2. Complete reasoning process - The company suspects over-filling, so we want to test whether μ is greater than 175 g. - The null should represent the status quo (μ = 175) and the alternative the claim (μ > 175). Some texts use H0: μ ≤ 175 vs H1: μ > 175; the equality formulation H0: μ = 175 is the canonical form for hypothesis testing. 3. Calculations (intermediate steps shown) - Sample mean x̄ = 176 g, sample standard deviation s = 5 g, sample size n = 100. - Standard error SE = s / √n = 5 / √100 = 5 / 10 = 0.5 g. - Test statistic (z or t approx): z = (x̄ − μ0) / SE = (176 − 175) / 0.5 = 1 / 0.5 = 2.0. (Although the question only asks for hypotheses, this shows how the sample would be used to test them.) 4. Why the correct answer is correct - Because the concern is specifically that the machine is over-filling, the alternative must be one-sided in the positive direction: μ > 175. The null is the baseline value μ = 175. 5. Why other options would be incorrect - H1: μ < 175 would assert under-filling, the opposite of the suspicion. - H1: μ ≠ 175 is two-sided and would test for any calibration error (over- or under-filling), which is not what the manager specifically suspects. - Using H0: μ ≥ 175 vs H1: μ < 175 would again contradict the over-fill concern. 6. Conclusion - The appropriate hypotheses are H0: mean = 175 versus H1: mean > 175, which matches the provided answer.

类似问题

By now Quackers is exhausted and is seriously considering giving up statistics and living a life of blissful ignorance paddling around a lake. But he has one more question for you first. "I understand statistical tests require many things. Which of these does it NOT require?"

By now Quackers is exhausted and is seriously considering giving up statistics and living a life of blissful ignorance paddling around a lake. But he has one more question for you first. "I understand statistical tests require many things. Which of these does it NOT require?"

Consider the following statistical references. Which one is impossible?

Of the following, which is the BEST statistical practice?

If you run a test and get a p-value of 0.0083, assuming an alpha of 0.05, what can you conclude?

Why is it difficult to conclude that a null hypothesis (H0) is correct in statistical hypothesis testing?

Which of the following is most accurate regarding the null hypothesis when comparing two samples?

Which of these statements is true about hypothesis testing?[Fill in the blank]

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单