If you know that some law restricts only unprotected speech, what can you conclude based on that fact alone?未知题型
A
The law violates the free speech clause of the First Amendment.
B
In order to be constitutional, the law must advance a substantial governmental interest.
C
The law doesn’t violate the free speech clause of the First Amendment.
D
If the law’s constitutionality is challenged in court, the law will need to pass either intermediate or strict scrutiny.
登录即可查看完整答案
我们收录了全球超50000道真实原题与详细解析,现在登录,立即获得答案。
类似问题
In the United States, the right to free speech:
In its 2011 Snyder v. Phelps ruling, the Supreme Court held that Westboro Baptist Church protests at military funerals
Strossen argues that censoring pornography would do more harm than good.
CASE MATCHING – match the case with the pertinent legal concept or topic. Each concept/topic can only be used once. 1: Edwards v. National Audubon Society 2: Konaté v. Burkina Faso 3: New York Times v. Sullivan 4: Near v. Minnesota 5: Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project 6: Hustler Magazine v. Falwell 7: Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire 8: Texas v. Johnson 9: Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co 10: Tinker v. Des Moines Independent School District
更多留学生实用工具
希望你的学习变得更简单
加入我们,立即解锁 海量真题 与 独家解析,让复习快人一步!