Read the case below and identify the component of the fraud triangle that was the primary factor driving the perpetrator to engage in fraud.

Adam Cranston, the son of former ATO deputy commissioner Michael Cranston, has been found guilty by a NSW Supreme Court jury over his role in a $105 million tax-fraud scheme.

Key points:
Adam worked with 2 others to scam the government by keeping over $100 million in taxes that should have been paid to the tax office.
They created companies with dummy directors - taking advantage of drug addicts who opened bank accounts and gave control to Adam and others.
It was reported in court that Adam took advantage of his father who worked for the tax office, to help facilitate the crimes, by monitoring investigations into potential fraud.

Question adapted from a news story, students do not need to read the article to answer the question https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11829035/Adam-Cranston-Son-ex-tax-office-boss-guilty-100-million-fraud-used-fund-life-luxury.html
Links to an external site.

Question

Read the case below and identify the component of the fraud triangle that was the primary factor driving the perpetrator to engage in fraud.

Adam Cranston, the son of former ATO deputy commissioner Michael Cranston, has been found guilty by a NSW Supreme Court jury over his role in a $105 million tax-fraud scheme.

Key points:
Adam worked with 2 others to scam the government by keeping over $100 million in taxes that should have been paid to the tax office.
They created companies with dummy directors - taking advantage of drug addicts who opened bank accounts and gave control to Adam and others.
It was reported in court that Adam took advantage of his father who worked for the tax office, to help facilitate the crimes, by monitoring investigations into potential fraud.

Question adapted from a news story, students do not need to read the article to answer the question https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11829035/Adam-Cranston-Son-ex-tax-office-boss-guilty-100-million-fraud-used-fund-life-luxury.html
Links to an external site.

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Opportunities: weaknesses in systems and controls that make fraud possible best explain why this scheme succeeded.

1. Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Fraud triangle: three components are (a) pressure or incentive (motivation to commit fraud), (b) opportunity (ability to commit fraud with low risk of detection due to control weaknesses), and (c) attitude or rationalisation (justifying the dishonest act).
- Opportunity is about exploiting system gaps, using insiders, or manipulating processes so detection and prevention are unlikely.

2. Step‑by‑step reasoning
- Step 1: Identify facts that map to each triangle component. The defendants created companies with dummy directors, recruited vulnerable people to open bank accounts and then ceded control, and used the insider access of Adam’s father to monitor tax office investigations.
- Step 2: Assess which factor was primary. Creating shell entities, controlling others’ bank accounts, and leveraging a tax‑office insider are direct exploitations of control weaknesses and detection gaps — classic opportunities.
- Step 3: Compare against other components. While the group likely had incentives (large sums, lifestyle) and may have rationalised their behavior, those are secondary; without the practical means and reduced detection risk, the fraud could not have been executed on this scale.

3. Intermediate logical steps (no numerical calculations needed)
- Dummy companies + controlled bank accounts = mechanism to divert funds.
- Insider monitoring of investigations = lowered perceived detection risk.
- Mechanism + lowered detection = high opportunity.

4. Why the correct answer is correct
The central enabler was the deliberate exploitation of institutional and procedural weaknesses (dummy directors, controlled accounts, insider access). These created the concrete opportunity to misappropriate tax funds and avoid detection, making opportunity the dominant component.

5. Why the other options are incorrect
- Incentives or pressure: Although financial gain was a motive, motive alone does not explain how the fraud was carried out.  
- Attitude or rationalisation: Rationalisation may explain moral justification, but it does not provide the means to perpetrate the fraud.

Conclusion: The primary factor driving the perpetrator was opportunities, which matches the provided correct answer: opportunities.

类似问题

The triple threat of fraud includes three factors, including: (Check all that apply.)

A project has a required return of 12.6 percent, an initial cash outflow of $42,100, and cash inflows of $16,500 in Year 1, $11,700 in Year 2, and $10,400 in Year 4. What is the net present value?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单