Which of the following is not an advantage of using conventional crude oil as an energy source?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Here is a step-by-step analysis of each option regarding whether it is an advantage of using conventional crude oil as an energy source.
Option 1: 'ample supply for several decades' — This is generally considered an advantage because conventional crude oil has sizable proven reserves that can sustain production for many years, supporting energy security and continuity of supply as long as demand and extraction rates remain steady. 
Option 2: 'efficient distribution system' — This is typically true for crude oil, given established global infrastructure including pipelines, tankers, refineries, and an integrated market network, making logistics and distribution relatively efficient compared to many alternative energy sources. 
Option 3: 'environmental costs are already included in the market price' — This is not an advantage. In reality, environmental costs (pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, ecosystem damage) are often externalities not reflected in the market price, leading to market failures and underpricing of the true societal costs. This misrepresentation makes the statement inaccurate as an advantage. 
Option 4: 'medium net energy yield' — This is debatable in practice; crude oil typically provides a high net energy yield relative to many energy sources, but framing it as 'medium' could be misleading. It is not a clear-cut advantage unless one accepts a high-yield characterization; calling it merely 'medium' understates its relative energy return. 
Option 5: 'low land disruption' — Conventional oil extraction generally causes relatively low land disruption per unit of energy created when comparing large-scale energy projects, pipelines, and offshore drilling to some alternatives, so this is considered an advantage. 
In summary, while options 1, 2, and 5 describe recognized advantages of conventional crude oil, option 3 is incorrect because environmental costs are not typically included in market prices, and option 4 is ambiguous or overstated depending on the comparison baseline. The statement that 'environmental costs are already included in the market price' stands out as not representing an actual advantage.

Which of the following is not an advantage of using conventional crude oil as an energy source?单项选择题

类似问题

According to the speaker, one advantage of burning fossil fuels is:

Currently, the world’s energy supply primarily comes from what source?

Choose the best answer to complete each sentence according to the information in the lecture. The reports predicts that over the next few decades:

The fossil fuels are still used to compensate the fluctuations.

Which are usual disadvantages of fossil fuels?

Which of the following trees corresponds to a potential parse of the ambiguous sentence below, with correct syntactic categories? Some diagnostics are provided.

Which of the following sentences contain two non-finite verbs? Select all that apply.

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单