What is the best way to protect food from deliberate tampering?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: What is the best way to protect food from deliberate tampering?

Option A: "A) Make it as difficult as possible for someone to tamper with it."
- Why this could be considered correct: Reducing tamperability by designing processes and facilities to minimize opportunities for interference is a foundational principle in security. The core idea is to create barriers, controls, and defensive measures that raise the effort, skill, time, or access required for tampering, thereby lowering risk.
- Why this reasoning holds: If it is difficult for someone to tamper with food, the chance of successful tampering drops. This aligns with general risk mitigation strategies that emphasize barriers, access controls, surveillance, and robust procedures.

Option B: "B) Allow former employees into the operation."
- Why this is incorrect: Granting access to former employees can introduce insider risk and unfamiliarity with current procedures. It may bypass current background checks and security protocols, increasing vulnerability rather than reducing it.
- Misconception addressed: The presence of trusted insiders is a security risk if not properly controlled and does not align with best practices for tamper prevention.

Option C: "C) Perform spot inspections on new vendors."
- Why this is not the best single strategy: While spot inspections on new vendors contribute to supply chain security, they are narrow in scope and reactive. They do not by themselves create a comprehensive protection against deliberate tampering across all stages of production and distribution.
- Reason this is insufficient: Relying solely on sporadic checks misses ongoing vulnerabilities, routine processes, and day-to-day tampering opportunities that occur outside inspection moments.

Option D: "D) Use the USDA A.L.A.R.M. system."
- Why this could be considered overkill or not the best answer here: If the question emphasizes a general best-practice approach, naming a specific system (A.L.A.R.M.) may reflect a particular framework, but the option’s correctness depends on whether A.L.A.R.M. is widely recognized as the standard for preventing tampering in the given context. Since the provided correct answer designation is A, this option is not treated as the best choice in this scenario.
- Potential confusion clarified: Different organizations use different security frameworks; while a formal system like A.L.A.R.M. can be effective, the question’s endorsed answer emphasizes making tampering difficult in general terms rather than naming a specific program.

Summary of reasoning across options:
- Option A focuses on the general principle of hardening the process and environment to deter tampering, which is a foundational and broad protective measure.
- Options B and C address specific human and procedural controls but are narrower in scope and could introduce risks or miss broader protections.
- Option D points to a named system, which might be appropriate in certain contexts, but in this item’s framing, the broader principle of making tampering difficult takes precedence as the best overarching approach.

What is the best way to protect food from deliberate tampering?单项选择题

类似问题

What was the world's first widely adopted biodiversity policy?

The aim of the Paris Agreement is to ensure that the earth’s preindustrial temperature is not exceeded by more than º Celsius.

The IPCC's mission is to Blank ______.

Why have most international agreements for environmental protection been based on the honor system?

As was exhibited with the Montreal Protocol and the encouragement of reduced CFC production, trade can be an effective tool to compel compliance with international treaties.

The Stockholm Declaration and UNEP were the result of the Blank ______ first conference on the Human Environment in 1972.

In addition to the direct mission of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), why was CITES so important?

President Trump hiring a corporate leader from the oil and gas industry to head the Department of Energy is an example of regulatory ; one intention behind this was to change environmental policy.

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单