Vredenburg studied the impact of the introduction of rainbow and brook trout on a species of amphibian, the mountain yellow-legged frog (Rana muscosa). After showing greatly decreased frog populations in lakes with trout, he set up an experiment using three categories of lakes: lakes from which he removed trout, lakes that had never had trout, and lakes that still contained trout. He compared the number of adult frogs per 10 m of shoreline in all groups, as shown in the figure. What is the most likely reason that Vredenburg chose to use a large-scale experimental design such as this, rather than a single lake or laboratory experiments?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

To understand why a broad, large-scale experimental design was chosen, we must consider what the question is asking and the nature of ecological interactions.
Option: 'A smaller study would not adequately answer the experimental question.' This statement reflects a common limitation in ecological research: results from a single site or a small number of lakes may not capture the variability across landscapes, species interactions, and environmental conditions that influence frog populations.
First, in a natural setting like lakes with and without trout, multiple factors such as lake size, predator presence, food resources, climate, and historical exposure to trout can differ among sites. A small study risks overgeneralizing findings from one or a few lakes to all lakes, thereby reducing external validity.
Second, random variation and context dependence can obscure cause-and-effect relationships when sample size is limited. By using three categories of lakes (trout-removed, trout-present, and trout-absent) across many lakes, the researcher can better isolate the effect of trout presence on adult frog abundance while accounting for site-to-site variability.
Third, large-scale designs allow for replication, which strengthens inference about causality. If the observed frog declines consistently align with trout presence across diverse lakes, confidence in a causal link rises compared to a single-lake study.
Fourth, laboratory experiments, while controlled, may fail to mimic the complex ecological interactions and stochastic events occurring in natural ecosystems. A large-scale, field-based design provides more realistic evidence about how trout introductions influence frog populations in real-world conditions.
In sum, the justification centers on improving generalizability, controlling for confounding variability, and enhancing causal inference by extending the study across many lakes rather than focusing on a single site or a laboratory setting.

类似问题

Why is it challenging to measure the effect of neonicotinoid insecticides on bee's health "in the field" as opposed to "in the laboratory"?

Is the following statement true or false? In the products of methylation-hydrolysis, every -OH group corresponds to the position of a glycosidic bond in the starting polysaccharide.

Which of the follwoing structures represents amylopectin?

Which of the following is true about an aldopentose?I. It is a monosaccharide.II. It contains a CHO groupIII. It is a disaccharide.IV. It is an oligosaccharide.

For stock A, we have 𝛽 𝑖 = 0.70. Suppose the expected market risk premium next year is 9% and the risk-free rate is 3%. What is the expected return of this stock based on the CAPM? (Please answer in % and round to 2 decimal places. If the answer is 8.057%, then in the box, write 8.06)

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单