An asset owner seeking to hire an investment manager believes that ESG factors are most important for risk management. To implement that belief, the asset manager will most likely suggest a strategy that:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

When ESG is used primarily to manage downside risk, the most direct implementation is to remove exposures that create outsized ESG-related losses — i.e., exclude companies, sectors, or geographies with known ESG risks.

1) Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- ESG as risk management focuses on reducing exposure to regulatory, reputational, litigation, and operational risks associated with environmental, social, or governance failings. 
- Common implementation approaches: negative screening (exclusions), positive screening/tilting (overweighting high-ESG companies), and passive replication of ESG benchmarks. Each approach has different risk-return and exposure consequences.

2) Step-by-step reasoning
- The asset owner’s priority is risk mitigation, not necessarily maximizing ESG exposure or following a benchmark.
- Negative screening directly removes entities with high ESG risk (e.g., coal miners, controversial weapons manufacturers, companies with serious governance issues), thereby eliminating their potential to cause portfolio losses linked to ESG events.
- Overweighting high-ESG companies reduces relative exposure to risky firms but does not eliminate all exposure because risky names can remain in the portfolio; replication of an ESG benchmark merely matches a predefined exposure profile and may still include some ESG risks the owner wants to avoid.

3) Calculations / intermediate steps
- No numerical calculation is required here. The logical “calculation” is a qualitative assessment: exclusion = removal of high-risk exposure (zero weight), overweighting = reduced but nonzero exposure, replication = matched exposure to benchmark.

4) Why the correct answer is correct
- Excluding companies/sectors/geographies is the most straightforward, assured way to remove ESG-related downside risk. It results in zero portfolio weight for targeted high-risk exposures and therefore directly protects against the types of ESG events the owner worries about.

5) Why other options are incorrect
- Structuring to replicate an ESG benchmark only tracks that benchmark’s risk profile and may not eliminate specific ESG risks the owner wants to avoid. 
- Overweighting high-ESG companies tilts toward lower-risk firms but does not guarantee removal of high-ESG-risk holdings and therefore is less definitive for risk management than exclusion.

6) Conclusion
Excluding some companies, sectors, or geographies based on ESG-related factors is the correct choice for an owner prioritizing ESG for risk management; this matches the provided answer.

An asset owner seeking to hire an investment manager believes that ESG factors are most important for risk management. To implement that belief, the asset manager will most likely suggest a strategy that:单项选择题

类似问题

What are the three pillars that ESG investing considers alongside traditional financial metrics?

Why are ESG factors important in bond investing?

Which of the following is least likely a way for a fund manager to demonstrate identification of ESG risk and opportunity, according to the PLSA?

For which type of ESG activity would it be easiest to evaluate the impact on a portfolio's performance?

A portfolio manager is creating a bond fund with an ESG tilt. In constructing the portfolio, the manager will:

Which is the most common ESG factor in strategic asset allocation?

Which of the following ESG factors is most often considered in strategic asset allocation?

Which of the following statements best describes discretionary ESG investment strategies?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单