An example of total and disjoint specialization would be:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Total specialization (completeness) requires every instance of the supertype to belong to at least one subtype; disjointness requires that an instance can belong to at most one subtype (never more than one). These are two independent constraints used in specialization/generalization in ER modeling.

1) Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Completeness constraint: total (every supertype instance appears in some subtype) vs partial (some may not).
- Disjointness constraint: disjoint (instances appear in at most one subtype) vs overlapping (instances may appear in multiple subtypes).
- A statement describing “must be either A or B” implies totality; adding “but not both” implies disjointness.

2) Step-by-step reasoning
- Examine the candidate statement: “Every employee must be either full-time or part-time, but not both.”
  - “Every employee must be either full-time or part-time” asserts that no employee is outside the subtypes → this is total specialization (completeness = total).
  - “but not both” asserts an employee cannot be in both subtypes simultaneously → this is disjointness.
- Therefore the statement encodes both total and disjoint constraints, i.e., total and disjoint specialization.

3) (No numerical calculations required.)

4) Why the correct answer is correct
- The phrase forces membership in exactly one subtype: totality ensures membership in at least one subtype; disjointness ensures membership in at most one subtype. Combined, they yield exactly one subtype per supertype instance. The given sentence explicitly states both conditions.

5) Why the other options are incorrect (briefly)
- “Some accounts are neither savings nor checking” indicates partial specialization (not total); it does not express totality, so not total+disjoint.
- “A bank customer can be both individual and corporate” explicitly allows membership in more than one subtype → overlapping, not disjoint (and not necessarily total).
- “A person can be a student, employee, or neither” allows instances outside subtypes → partial (not total); it also doesn’t forbid both student and employee, so not necessarily disjoint.

6) Conclusion
The correct choice, “Every employee must be either full-time or part-time, but not both,” matches total and disjoint specialization. This confirms the provided answer.

An example of total and disjoint specialization would be:单项选择题

类似问题

Generalization is a process that proceeds:

A derived attribute is one that:

Which of the following is TRUE about a Total Disjoint Constraint in specialization?

Question at position 47 The number of entity types that participate in a relationship is called the: degree.counter.number.identifying characteristic.

Question at position 48 The subtype discriminator is a composite attribute when there is a(n):disjoint rule.partial specialization.overlap rule.full specialization.

Question at position 38 Supertype/subtype relationships should not be used when instances of a subtype do not participate in any relationships unique to that subtype and have no unique attributes.TrueFalse

Question at position 39 The name used for an entity type should never be the same in other E-R diagrams on which the entity appears. TrueFalse

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单