According to David Sobel, which of the following is NOT an appropriate strategy for teaching environmental education?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

According to David Sobel, the aim of environmental education should be to cultivate ongoing relationships with local environments through experiential, place-based learning, empathy, and actionable involvement. With that framework in mind, let’s evaluate each option.
Option 1: 'Cultivate students’ sense of empathy with local nature in an early age.' This aligns with Sobel’s emphasis on developing affective connections to place and fostering care for the environment from a young age, so this is a supported strategy.
Option 2: 'Encourage students to get outside and explore nature more.' Outdoor exploration is central to place-based and experiential education, helping students form meaningful connections with their surroundings, so this is consistent with Sobel’s approach.
Option 3: 'Get students informed about environmental tragedies as early as possible.' While awareness of environmental issues is important, Sobel cautions against overwhelming students with disaster-focused information early on, as it can lead to fear or apathy rather than constructive engagement. The emphasis should be on positive, relevant, place-based experiences and empowerment, not sensationalist tragedy messaging.
Option 4: 'Offer tangible actions for students to get involved in dealing with local environmental issues.' Providing actionable involvement aligns with Sobel’s goal of translating learning into community-facing action and stewardship, making this a recommended strategy.
In summary, the reasoning behind the non-preferred option centers on timing and framing: introducing environmental tragedies too early can skew motivation and reduce agency, whereas the other options build empathy, direct experience, and practical action that Sobel advocates for in environmental education. The flawed choice is the one that highlights early tragedy information over constructive, place-based engagement.

According to David Sobel, which of the following is NOT an appropriate strategy for teaching environmental education?单项选择题

类似问题

Who is the influential person who defined environmental education as "producing a citizenry that is knowledgeable concerning the biospherical environment and its associated problems, aware of how to help solve these problems, and motivated to work towards their solution"?

A 62.9 kg lady is standing on a weighing scale in an elevator as shown in the diagram below. Assume gravitational acceleration = 15 ms-2 Given that the elevator is accelerating upwards at 3.7 ms-2 , determine the magnitude of the normal force on the lady.

An object is fired from ground level at an angle of 31.9 degrees to the horizontal. Taking acceleration due to gravity = 7.65 ms-2 If the initial speed is 5.6 ms-1, how far from the starting point will it hit the ground? Assume air resistance is negligible.

Which of the following equations of motion would be used to calculate the displacement given the initial and final velocities as well as the acceleration?

A 51.8 kg lady is standing on a weighing scale (calibrated to 9.81 ms-2) in an elevator as shown in the diagram below. The scale is then calibrated to 7.67 ms-2 Given that the elevator is accelerating downwards at 2.2 ms-2 , determine the reading on the scale.

An object is fired from ground level at an angle of 39 degrees to the horizontal. Taking acceleration due to gravity = 7.65 ms-2 If the initial speed is 6.8 ms-1, how far from the starting point will it hit the ground? Assume air resistance is negligible.

Which of the following equations of motion would be used to calculate the displacement given the initial and final velocities as well as the time taken?

Which of the following is the best example of a homogeneous product?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单