Empirical evidence on Gross Domestic Product (GDP) effects of SM accession suggests:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

In evaluating empirical evidence on GDP effects of EU SM accession, we need to compare what the literature typically finds across countries and contexts.
Option a. 'Gains are purely static and vanish after five years.' This claim suggests that all effects are short-lived and do not persist, which is inconsistent with many studies showing persistent, though varying, GDP effects that depend on longer-run structural changes rather than purely static gains.
Option b. 'Estimated gains display substantial cross-country heterogeneity, depending on institutional capacity.' This aligns with the common empirical pattern: countries differ in institutions, governance, reform pace, and absorptive capacity, leading to diverse GDP outcomes after accession. It emphasizes: (1) cross-country variation in estimated gains, (2) the role of institutional quality in shaping those gains, and (3) the importance of country-specific dynamics rather than a one-size-fits-all result.
Option c. 'Economies of new member states experienced homogenous long-run GDP responses.' This is the opposite of what the literature typically finds; it assumes uniform effects across diverse economies, ignoring heterogeneity in institutions and structural reforms, which is rarely supported by empirical evidence.
Option d. 'Post-accession growth trajectories can be fully explained by net fiscal transfers' This claim overstates the explanatory power of fiscal transfers alone, ignoring other mechanisms such as productivity, investment, integration effects, governance, and structural reforms that influence long-run growth beyond transfers.
Thus, option b correctly captures the nuanced, heterogeneous nature of GDP responses after SM accession, while the other options rely on oversimplified or incorrect generalizations.

Empirical evidence on Gross Domestic Product (GDP) effects of SM accession suggests:单项选择题

类似问题

In the United States, business cycles have occurred against a backdrop of a long-run trend of

What actions can a government take to increase long-run economic growth?

Output per person is higher when:

In order to promote growth in living standards, policymakers must

The catch-up effect refers to the idea that[Fill in the blank]

Australia’s annual growth rate of real GDP per person was 2.08 per cent for the period 1950–2000. Which of the following statements is correct?[Fill in the blank]

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单