Question at position 8 What is a "Dissenting Opinion"?An opinion written by a justice who agrees with the majority but for different reasonsAn opinion written by justices who disagree with the majority's conclusionA summary of the case written by the news mediaA ruling previously made by a lower court

Question

Question at position 8 What is a "Dissenting Opinion"?An opinion written by a justice who agrees with the majority but for different reasonsAn opinion written by justices who disagree with the majority's conclusionA summary of the case written by the news mediaA ruling previously made by a lower court

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

A dissenting opinion is an opinion written by justices who disagree with the majority's conclusion.

1. Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Majority opinion: the court’s official ruling explaining the reasoning that supports the outcome agreed to by more than half the justices. It becomes the controlling decision in that case.
- Dissenting opinion: one or more justices explain why they disagree with the majority’s conclusion and reasoning.
- Concurring opinion: a justice agrees with the outcome (majority) but writes separately to explain different reasoning.
- Precedent and lower-court rulings: decisions from higher courts set precedent; lower-court rulings are past decisions from trial or appellate courts, not called dissents.

2. Step-by-step reasoning process
Step 1: Identify the choices and match to legal definitions.
Step 2: Compare each choice with the definitions above.
Step 3: Determine which definition matches “dissenting opinion.”

3. Intermediate steps / demonstration
- Option A: “An opinion written by a justice who agrees with the majority but for different reasons” — definition of a concurring opinion, not a dissent.
- Option B: “An opinion written by justices who disagree with the majority's conclusion” — matches the standard definition of a dissenting opinion.
- Option C: “A summary of the case written by the news media” — this is a news article, not a judicial opinion.
- Option D: “A ruling previously made by a lower court” — this describes a lower-court decision or prior ruling, not a dissent.

4. Why the correct answer is correct
A dissent explicitly records the disagreement of one or more justices with the court’s majority outcome and reasoning. Dissents articulate alternate legal views or critiques and are titled “dissenting opinions.” They do not change the majority ruling immediately but can influence future legal development.

5. Why other options are incorrect
- A is incorrect because it defines a concurrence, not a dissent.
- C is incorrect because media summaries are not judicial opinions.
- D is incorrect because a prior lower-court ruling is not a dissenting opinion.

6. Conclusion / confirmation
The correct answer is: “An opinion written by justices who disagree with the majority's conclusion,” which matches the provided answer.

类似问题

What was the world's first widely adopted biodiversity policy?

The aim of the Paris Agreement is to ensure that the earth’s preindustrial temperature is not exceeded by more than º Celsius.

The IPCC's mission is to Blank ______.

Why have most international agreements for environmental protection been based on the honor system?

As was exhibited with the Montreal Protocol and the encouragement of reduced CFC production, trade can be an effective tool to compel compliance with international treaties.

The Stockholm Declaration and UNEP were the result of the Blank ______ first conference on the Human Environment in 1972.

In addition to the direct mission of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), why was CITES so important?

President Trump hiring a corporate leader from the oil and gas industry to head the Department of Energy is an example of regulatory ; one intention behind this was to change environmental policy.

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单