Consider the following behaviors from the perspective of Freud's defense mechanisms:

Magnus has been drinking too much recently. When confronted about it, he claimed that his substance use is not problematic.
Jack is frustrated by his boss at work. He goes home and kicks his dog, instead of telling his boss how he feels.
Sara dislikes her new coworker, but instead of accepting that, she tells herself that her new coworker dislikes her.

Which of the following is correctly identifies the defense mechanism in each scenario?

Question

Consider the following behaviors from the perspective of Freud's defense mechanisms:

Magnus has been drinking too much recently. When confronted about it, he claimed that his substance use is not problematic.
Jack is frustrated by his boss at work. He goes home and kicks his dog, instead of telling his boss how he feels.
Sara dislikes her new coworker, but instead of accepting that, she tells herself that her new coworker dislikes her.

Which of the following is correctly identifies the defense mechanism in each scenario?

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks you to identify which defense mechanism label correctly matches each described scenario. Here are the scenarios in brief before evaluating the options:
- Magnus drinks heavily and claims it isn’t a problem.
- Jack loses anger at his boss by kicking his dog at home.
- Sara convinces herself that her coworker dislikes her, instead of facing the coworker directly.

Option 1: '1 is denial; 2 is repression; 3 is projection'
- For Magnus, denial would be stating the problem doesn’t exist, which fits. Repression would be keeping an uncomfortable thought out of conscious awareness; there is no suggestion Magnus is actively burying the idea of drinking as a problem, so this misnames the second scenario. Projection is not used for Sara here; she is not attributing her own feelings to someone else, she is attributing the coworker’s attitude to the coworker, which would be projection if she believed the coworker dislikes her, but the wording implies she believes the coworker dislikes her, revealing her own thoughts as being projected outward. Overall, this option mislabels the second mechanism.

Option 2: '1 is denial; 2 is displacement; 3 is projection'
- Magnus’s statement that his drinking isn’t a problem is classic denial, a refusal to acknowledge a distressing aspect of reality. The second case, Jack kicking his dog instead of addressing the boss, demonstrates displacement—unacceptable or safer target for the emotion (frustration) is chosen (the dog) rather than the real source. Sara’s belief that the coworker dislikes her is an example of projection—the person attributes their own unacceptable thoughts or feelings onto someone else. This option aligns each scenario with the standard definitions.

Option 3: '1 is displacement; 2 is projection; 3 is denial'
- Here, Magnus would be labeled as displacement, which doesn’t fit since there’s no misdirection of emotion to a safe outlet; the denial label would be more accurate. For the second scenario, labeling it as projection would mean she attributes her own anger to the boss rather than to the dog, which isn’t described. The third scenario as denial is also incorrect because it describes attributing disliked feelings to someone else rather than denying them entirely. This combination mismatches the typical definitions.

Option 4: '1 is displacement; 2 is projection; 3 is repression'
- Denial would be a better fit for Magnus than displacement, so this mislabels the first case. The second case, displacement, could be argued in some readings but usually involves redirecting emotion from the original target; the dog as a target fits, yet the third being repression (unconscious withholding of a thought) doesn’t fit Sara’s explicit belief about the coworker. Overall, this set fails to capture the intended mappings.

Option 5: '1 is denial; 2 is projection; 3 is displacement'
- The first one is correct about denial, but the second one would be projection if she were attributing her own feelings to the boss or someone else; however, she directs anger toward an animal rather than others, which is more characteristic of displacement than projection. The third being displacement would be inaccurate because she is attributing her own feelings to the coworker (which is projection) rather than misplacing blame elsewhere. Hence this option mixes up the second and third labels.

In summary, the combination that matches standard definitions for each described case is denial for Magnus, displacement for Jack, and projection for Sara. The other options mislabel one or more scenarios, leading to inconsistencies with well-established defense-mechanism classifications.

类似问题

A teenager who feels attracted to a classmate behaves in an overly hostile and dismissive way toward them. Which defense mechanism is at play?

Jose is unconsciously angry at his roommate, so he goes out of his way to be kind and helpful. What kind of defense mechanism would Freud suggest Jose is using?

The unconscious act of keeping or threatening thoughts, feelings, or impulses out of consciousness is called

A classmate gets a low grade on this exam. When you discuss the exam results with this person, they blame their performance on the difficulty of the material and their belief that the material is irrelevant. This student appears to be using which defence mechanism to explain their poor behaviour?

How does projection differ from reaction formation?

In the psychoanalytic theory, the ego preserves or protects itself from feelings of anxiety by using defense mechanism.

A mother who has deep-seated hostility toward her only child but shows overprotection and hyperconcern for the physical well-being of her child illustrates which Freudian defense mechanism?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单