Which of the following approaches is best when deciding what model to use, e.g. when deciding what polynomial degree to use in regression?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks: Which approach is best when deciding what model to use, such as selecting the polynomial degree in regression?
Option provided: 'First, split the data into training and validation set. Train the models on the train data, and pick the one with lowest error on the validation set.'
Consideration of this option: Splitting data into training and validation sets and choosing the model based on validation error is a standard, practical approach to model selection. It helps assess how well a model generalizes to unseen data, which is the core goal beyond simply fitting the training data.
Reason this helps: Training on one portion and evaluating on a separate hold-out validation set reduces the risk of overfitting to the training data and provides an unbiased estimate of generalization performance. The model with the lowest validation error is typically preferred because it is expected to perform better on new data.
Potential caveats and refinements: Relying on a single train/validation split can lead to high variance in the chosen model if the split is not representative. In practice, one might use cross-validation (e.g., k-fold CV) to obtain a more stable estimate of generalization error across multiple splits, or use a separate test set for final evaluation after model selection. Additionally, care should be taken with the evaluation metric to ensure it aligns with the task (e.g., RMSE for regression, MAE, or others as appropriate). Regularization, model complexity limits, or information criteria could also inform model choice beyond raw validation error. Avoid relying on training error alone, as this tends to favor more complex models that overfit. The statement implicitly assumes the availability of multiple candidate models (e.g., various polynomial degrees) to compare, which is necessary for this approach to work.
In summary, the proposed method is sound as a general strategy for model selection, with the common caveats that single-split evaluation can be improved with cross-validation and that evaluation metrics and regularization considerations should guide the final choice.

Which of the following approaches is best when deciding what model to use, e.g. when deciding what polynomial degree to use in regression?单项选择题

类似问题

In a 75%/25% Cross-Validation

Please select the incorrect statements about k-fold cross-validation and Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation (LOOCV):

Assuming doing a 10-fold cross validation for linear regression (Y = AX + B). It is possible that 10 different As and Bs would be generated, one for each model learned.

Cross-validation is a special case of the validation set approach.

Suppose we are going to perform K-fold cross-validation. If we make 5 folds from the data set that has 100 observations. Which of the following are true statements?

A 62.9 kg lady is standing on a weighing scale in an elevator as shown in the diagram below. Assume gravitational acceleration = 15 ms-2 Given that the elevator is accelerating upwards at 3.7 ms-2 , determine the magnitude of the normal force on the lady.

An object is fired from ground level at an angle of 31.9 degrees to the horizontal. Taking acceleration due to gravity = 7.65 ms-2 If the initial speed is 5.6 ms-1, how far from the starting point will it hit the ground? Assume air resistance is negligible.

Which of the following equations of motion would be used to calculate the displacement given the initial and final velocities as well as the acceleration?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单