Question at position 39 Multiple Choice Question: Which of the following is NOT an advantage of cross-validation over simple train-test split? It utilizes the data more effectively than a single train-test split.It reduces the sensitivity of the model's performance to the train-test split.It provides the distribution of a metric to evaluate the model's performance.It always improves the model's generalization to unseen data.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

To analyze this question, I will evaluate each statement about cross-validation (CV) and distinguish which one does not describe an advantage over a simple train-test split.
Option 1: 'It utilizes the data more effectively than a single train-test split.' This is true. CV, by repeatedly training on different subsets and validating on hold-out parts, makes fuller use of the available data for both training and evaluation, compared with a single split that discards a portion of data for testing.
Option 2: 'It reduces the sensitivity of the model's performance to the train-test split.' This is also true. Since CV averages performance across multiple partitions, results are less dependent on a particular random split, reducing variance due to split choice.
Option 3: 'It provides the distribution of a metric to evaluate the model's performance.' This is correct. CV yields a distribution (e.g., a set of scores across folds), which offers insight into variability and reliability of the model's performance rather than a single point estimate.
Option 4: 'It always improves the model's generalization to unseen data.' This is the statement that is not necessarily true. While CV offers better estimates and reduces overfitting risk, it does not guarantee that the model will generalize better to truly unseen data in practice. The chosen model, hyperparameters, and data distribution still determine generalization, and CV can even lead to optimistic tuning if used improperly (e.g., leakage, inappropriate preprocessing). Therefore, this claim overstates CV's guarantees.
In summary, options 1–3 describe accurate advantages of cross-validation, whereas option 4 makes an absolute claim about generalization that CV does not guarantee in all scenarios.

类似问题

What is the purpose of cross validation?

Among the following training and evaluation strategies, which of them divides the dataset into k subsets and, at each iteration, a different subset is reserved for testing and all the others, used for training?

What is the purpose of performing cross-validation?

When training models using machine learning, a very powerful technique for tuning and optimizing the best model is:

Why was model-building strategy #1 used to estimate generalization performance on the income data for the decision tree, logistic regression, and random forest models?

In k-fold cross-validation, what happens in each iteration?

What is one advantage of k-fold cross-validation over a single holdout set?

Which of the following is TRUE about cross validation?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单