A Chief Financial Officer (CFO) invested in Division A last year and is considering whether to invest in Division B this year. Division B requires the utilization of some spare capacity of a machine in Division A but produces completely different products.[Fill in the blank]

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Incremental cash flows and opportunity costs determine which costs belong to a new project. Past expenditures (the machine’s original purchase) are sunk and irrelevant, but any future cash flows caused by Division B’s use of Division A’s machine are relevant.

1) Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Sunk cost: historical cost already incurred (irrelevant for the current decision).  
- Incremental (marginal) cash flows: only additional future cash inflows/outflows caused by accepting the project.  
- Opportunity cost: the value of the best alternative use of resources.  
- Accelerated depreciation/replacement: increased use can shorten useful life, causing earlier replacement and a future cash outflow; that future replacement cost is incremental and must be included.

2) Step-by-step reasoning
- The machine was bought last year: that purchase is a sunk cost and should not affect the evaluation.  
- Division B will use spare capacity but will cause additional wear, so the machine’s remaining life shortens → replacement happens sooner than otherwise.  
- The earlier replacement is a new, incremental cash outflow caused by Division B and thus must be included when computing Division B’s project cash flows (or allocated appropriately).

3) Example (intermediate arithmetic)
- Suppose replacement cost = $50,000; without B replacement in 10 years, with B in 8 years. Discount rate r. Incremental PV of replacement = 50,000/(1+r)^8 − 50,000/(1+r)^10 which is positive, so the project bears an extra PV cost.

4) Why the correct answer is correct
- Option b explicitly recognizes that faster depreciation → earlier replacement → an incremental cash outflow attributable to Division B, which is the correct treatment under capital budgeting.

5) Why other options are incorrect
- a: wrong because there is a correct option.  
- c: incorrect insofar as it suggests never mixing flows; interactions (like accelerated wear) create relevant incremental cash flows that must be included.  
- d: incorrect because using the firm WACC for all projects is not always appropriate; project/division-specific risk or opportunity cost should guide discounting, and moreover Division A’s past decision is irrelevant now.

Conclusion: therefore option b is correct, matching the provided answer.

A Chief Financial Officer (CFO) invested in Division A last year and is considering whether to invest in Division B this year. Division B requires the utilization of some spare capacity of a machine in Division A but produces completely different products.[Fill in the blank]单项选择题

类似问题

PA4. What is April Industries’ standard price for one unit of material?

EA2. What is the standard cost per chest for labor?

EA5. What if 9,500 pounds were used to make these ladders, what would be the direct materials quantity variance?

Which of the following is a cost pool used with the activity-based costing method?

A partial listing of costs incurred at Rust Corporation during August appears below: What is the total amount of product cost listed above?

Beauchesne Corporation, a manufacturing company, has provided the following data for the month of May: Raw materials purchased during May totaled $69,000 and the cost of goods manufactured totaled $146,000. What was the cost of goods sold for May?

Beauchesne Corporation, a manufacturing company, has provided the following data for the month of May: Raw materials purchased during May totaled $69,000 and the cost of goods manufactured totaled $146,000. What was the cost of raw materials used in production during May?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单