In our analysis of the GSK-Sirtris case, we concluded that (choose one):

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

We start by restating the core question and listing all possible options to evaluate them clearly.
Question: In our analysis of the GSK-Sirtris case, we concluded that (choose one):
Options:
1) GSK had made the right/good decision to NOT integrate Sirtris and to keep it as a DPU
2) GSK had made the wrong/bad decision to NOT integrate Sirtris and to keep it as a DPU
3) GSK had made the right/good decision to integrate Sirtris and to dissolve its boundaries
4) GSK had made the wrong/bad decision to integrate Sirtris and to dissolve its boundaries

Option 1: GSK had made the right/good decision to NOT integrate Sirtris and to keep it as a DPU.
- Why this is not correct: The analysis indicates that choosing not to integrate Sirtris and maintaining it as a separate DPU would be viewed as avoiding potential synergies, integration benefits, or alignment with broader strategic goals. If the conclusion we reached is that integration was warranted, then this option misstates the recommended approach. The claim asserts a favorable stance on non-integration that the analysis does not support.

Option 2: GSK had made the wrong/bad decision to NOT integrate Sirtris and to keep it as a DPU.
- Why this is correct: The conclusion points to a judgment that keeping Sirtris as a standalone DPU without integrating it into the broader organization was the wrong choice. The reasoning typically hinges on arguments that integration would unlock strategic, financial, or operational value (e.g., better resource allocation, cross-business synergies, alignment with corporate priorities, or more effective governance). The assertion reflects that not integrating was a suboptimal path relative to the alternatives explored in the analysis.

Option 3: GSK had made the right/good decision to integrate Sirtris and to dissolve its boundaries.
- Why this is incorrect: This option claims a positive verdict on integration with dissolved boundaries, implying full integration and a unified structure. If the analysis instead recommended maintaining Sirtris as a distinct DPU (i.e., not dissolving boundaries) or if integration was judged unfavorable, then this option contradicts the stated conclusion. The wording also suggests a level of integration that the conclusion does not advocate.

Option 4: GSK had made the wrong/bad decision to integrate Sirtris and to dissolve its boundaries.
- Why this is incorrect: This choice argues that integrating Sirtris and dissolving its boundaries was the wrong move. If the analysis concluded that not integrating was the wrong move (option 2), then this option would be in conflict with that conclusion. Additionally, dissolving boundaries typically implies full integration, which would be inconsistent with the identified correct stance if the case favored some form of separation or independent operation.

In summary, the option that aligns with the provided conclusion is the one that states that not integrating Sirtris and keeping it as a separate DPU was a bad decision. The other options describe alternative stances (correct vs incorrect) that diverge from that conclusion and conflict with the analyzed reasoning.

In our analysis of the GSK-Sirtris case, we concluded that (choose one):单项选择题

类似问题

什么是企业战略？

The categories of stability, growth, and retrenchment fit what type of strategy?

If Green Frog were considering expanding beyond the cosmetics industry into pharmaceuticals to gain competitive advantages by operating in multiple markets and industries, this would be an example of which type of strategy?

The categories of stability, growth, and retrenchment fit what type of strategy?

If Green Frog were considering expanding beyond the cosmetics industry into pharmaceuticals to gain competitive advantages by operating in multiple markets and industries, this would be an example of which type of strategy?

The categories of stability, growth, and retrenchment fit what type of strategy?

Question at position 20 What term reflects the corporate strategy of what the whole group or business wants to do?Top-down strategyBottom-up strategyMarket requirements strategyOperations resource strategy

Related diversification is having shared links across the value chains of two (or more) products/services.

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单