Dave owns two scooters, worth $1,000 and $500, respectively. Neil enters into a contract to buy “Dave's scooter" for $750. Dave believes, in good faith, that he is selling the $500 scooter. Neil believes, in good faith, that he is buying the $1,000 scooter. In this situation

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The core issue here is the identity of the goods being sold and whether the contract can be enforced when the parties have different beliefs about which item constitutes 'Dave's scooter.'
Option 1: 'Dave is entitled to $750 for the $500 scooter.' This would improperly treat the contract as a value-based sale of whichever scooter is identified, ignoring the dispute about which specific scooter was being sold. Under the facts, the contract’s enforceability does not rest on transferring $750 for a particular price of a specific scooter unless the item is properly identified and agreed upon; thus this option misstates the remedy and misapplies the identification principle.
Option 2: 'the contract is not enforceable.' Here is the key idea: both parties operate under a mistaken belief about the identity of the goods. Dave thinks he is selling the $500 scooter, while Neil thinks he is buying the $1,000 scooter. In contract law, when both parties are mistaken about the identity or identification of the specific goods at the time of contracting (a fundamental fact), the contract is typically voidable or unenforceable because there is no agreement on the same thing. This reflects the principle that a contract for the sale of specific goods requires a shared understanding of which goods are being exchanged; without that, there is no meeting of the minds about the essential subject matter.
Option 3: 'Neil must buy both scooters for $1,500.' This option ignores the core issue of misidentification and incorrectly expands the remedy beyond the contract as formed. The contract is not a joint purchase of both items; it is a single sale allegedly of 
"Dave's scooter" for $750, but the identity problem undermines enforceability rather than creating a two-item purchase obligation.
Option 4: 'Neil is entitled to the $1,000 scooter for $750.' This asserts a specific allocation of the more valuable scooter to Neil regardless of the misidentification issue. It assumes the item, rather than the disagreement about which item constitutes the contract, but the problem is precisely that there is no agreement on which scooter is being sold, so this option does not reflect how the contract would be treated given the mistaken identities.
In summary, the distinguishing factor is the mutual mistake about the identity of the subject matter. Because Dave and Neil disagree about which scooter is being sold, the contract lacks a true consensus on the essential term, making it not enforceable. The other options either misstate the remedy or ignore the critical misidentification problem.

Dave owns two scooters, worth $1,000 and $500, respectively. Neil enters into a contract to buy “Dave's scooter" for $750. Dave believes, in good faith, that he is selling the $500 scooter. Neil believes, in good faith, that he is buying the $1,000 scooter. In this situation单项选择题

类似问题

Zenith Urban Projects and ArchiSteel contract for steel beams, both relying on outdated plans specifying “Grade X-90.” They later discover only “Grade X-95” complies with building codes, halting the project and causing costly delays.

What was the world's first widely adopted biodiversity policy?

The aim of the Paris Agreement is to ensure that the earth’s preindustrial temperature is not exceeded by more than º Celsius.

The IPCC's mission is to Blank ______.

Why have most international agreements for environmental protection been based on the honor system?

As was exhibited with the Montreal Protocol and the encouragement of reduced CFC production, trade can be an effective tool to compel compliance with international treaties.

The Stockholm Declaration and UNEP were the result of the Blank ______ first conference on the Human Environment in 1972.

In addition to the direct mission of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), why was CITES so important?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单