Which statement is false regarding the statute of frauds?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The statute of frauds is a doctrine that requires certain types of contracts to be evidenced by a writing to be enforceable, not a rule about contracts that are fraudulent. That distinction is the key to identifying the false statement.

1) Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Origin: English Statute of Frauds (1677); adopted in some form by U.S. states.  
- Purpose: to prevent perjury and unreliable oral testimony by requiring written evidence for specified agreements.  
- Typical covered contracts: promises involving transfer of land, agreements that cannot be performed within one year, surety (promise to answer for another’s debt), marriage promises, and (under the UCC) sale of goods over a statutory amount (UCC 2-201).  
- Legal status: primarily state law (or codified in state statutes/UCC), not a single federal statute.

2) Step-by-step reasoning to evaluate each option
- A) “It relates to fraudulent contracts.” Interpret literally: this claims the statute governs contracts that are themselves fraudulent. That is incorrect. The statute’s name refers to preventing fraud in proof of agreements, not to regulating or defining fraudulent contracts. Therefore A is false.  
- B) “It does not address illegal contracts.” True: the statute of frauds governs enforceability and form (writing), not the substantive legality of the contract; illegal contracts are unenforceable for separate reasons.  
- C) “It does not exist at the federal level.” True: there is no single federal statute; states (and the UCC adoption) control these rules. Federal courts apply state statute-of-frauds law.  
- D) “It requires that only certain contracts be in writing.” True: only specified categories require writing to be enforceable.  
- E) “It is not a unitary government act.” True: it is not a single, uniform federal enactment—rules vary by state and by UCC adoption.

3) Why the correct answer is correct
Because the statute of frauds concerns the required form (writing) for certain contracts and preventing fraudulent proof, it does not “relate to fraudulent contracts.” That statement mischaracterizes its purpose.

Conclusion: The false statement is A) It relates to fraudulent contracts. This matches the provided correct answer.

Which statement is false regarding the statute of frauds? 单项选择题

类似问题

Which of the following are considered tenets of contract law?

Contract law is also known as the law of private agreements.

The law of Answer Question 2[input] is also known as the law of private agreements.

Most-favored-customer clause

All states except and adhere to the admission exception to the statute of frauds.

________ is the term for contracts within the statute of frauds involving promises to pay a debt of another if the initial party fails to pay.

Which of the following is false regarding written contracts? .

A(n) ________ occurs when one person agrees to answer for the debts or duties of another person.

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单