Consider a company A that produces a product that consumers are willing-to-pay a maximum price of $80 and it charges a price of $75. This company competes with company B which produces a substitute product that consumers are willing-to-pay a maximum price of $70. What is the maximum price that company B can charge?单项选择题
A
$60
B
$65
C
$55
D
$70

Question

Consider a company A that produces a product that consumers are willing-to-pay a maximum price of $80 and it charges a price of $75. This company competes with company B which produces a substitute product that consumers are willing-to-pay a maximum price of $70. What is the maximum price that company B can charge?单项选择题

A

$60

B

$65

C

$55

D

$70

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

We start by restating the scenario to clarify what's being asked. Company A sells a product that customers are willing to pay up to $80 for, and it charges $75. Company B offers a substitute product with a maximum willingness-to-pay of $70 for customers. The question asks for the maximum price Company B can charge.

Option 1: $60. This price is below both the competitors' prices in the given context and well below B's own upper bound of $70. While charging $60 would likely attract price-sensitive customers and maintain demand in the presence of A’s $75 price, it is not the highest price at which B could still compete. It’s therefore not the maximum acceptable price.

Option 2: $65. Pricing at $65 keeps B undercutting A by $10 (A is $75). Since customers view B as a substitute, undercutting A by a meaningful margin helps ensure demand from price-sensitive buyers who would otherwise consider A. Given B’s substitute relationship and the difference in WTP (70 for B’s product vs. 80 for A’s), $65 can be the highest price that still reliably attracts enough turnout away from A to be profitable, balancing the trade-off between margin and demand.

Option 3: $55. This is a deeper undercut than necessary and reduces B’s margin further than needed. While it would still capture demand against A, it is not the maximum price B could charge. The aim is to identify the upper bound, not an unnecessarily low price.

Option 4: $70. This is the ceiling of B’s stated willingness-to-pay. In principle, charging $70 could maximize per-unit revenue while ensuring customers preferring B over A purchase B. However, in a competitive environment where A is priced at $75, some customers may still choose A due to perceived differences or brand affinity unless B’s value proposition fully matches or exceeds A’s; depending on the assumed substitutability and market response, $70 might not always be sustainable as the maximum price. In many textbook interpretations of this setup, the practical maximum under competition with A’s lower price and higher WTP is below $70, which aligns with selecting a price like $65 rather than the full $70.

Summing up, among the options, $65 represents the highest price that still undercuts A by a margin that sustains demand for B in the presence of A’s $75 price, without requiring B to price up to the full $70 (which may not be feasible in practice given substitution effects and relative product appeal).

类似问题

Consumer surplus could be the shaded area in which of the following situations?

The difference between the value of a product to a customer and the price paid is called:

In which scenario would consumers have the most bargaining power, leading to a maximum value for consumer surplus ?

Firm A sells a product with a willingness to pay (WTP) of $120 at a price of $100. Firm B sells a similar product with a WTP of $110. Under surplus parity, what price should Firm B set for their Product?

If Darby values a soccer ball at $50, and she pays $40 for it, her consumer surplus is $10.

Henry is willing to pay 45 cents, and Janine is willing to pay 55 cents, for 1 pound of bananas. When the price of bananas falls from 50 cents a pound to 40 cents a pound,

If Darby values a soccer ball at $50, and she pays $40 for it, her consumer surplus is $90.

25. Three consumers: Jon, Wang, and Ariana went to a shopping center to buy a T-shirt. Jon was willing to pay $20, Wang was willing to pay $30, and Ariana was willing to pay $40 for the same show. If the market (equilibrium price) was $20 per shoe, the consumer surplus equals

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单