The key difference between the interactive activation model of reading and the TRACE model of speech perception is that only the former contains lateral inhibition at the word level.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The statement to evaluate is: 'The key difference between the interactive activation model of reading and the TRACE model of speech perception is that only the former contains lateral inhibition at the word level.'

Option analysis:
- Option: False
  The TRACE model of speech perception is characterized by a highly interconnected, parallel architecture with multiple levels (feature, phoneme, and word) that not only propagates activation both bottom-up and top-down but also includes competitive interactions across units at each level. Importantly, TRACE includes lateral (competitive) interactions at the word level, where multiple candidate words compete for activation and inhibit each other. Therefore, lateral inhibition at the word level is not unique to the interactive activation model; TRACE also employs such inhibition. This makes the claim that only the reading IA model has word-level lateral inhibition incorrect.

Why the statement is incorrect in more detail:
- The interactive activation model (reading) was designed to account for letter and feature-level interactions, with lateral inhibition operating to help resolve ambiguity among letters and features, but this model does not entail word-level lateral inhibition as a central, defining feature. Its emphasis is on how letters activate possible words and how feedback can strengthen or weaken activation, often without positing explicit word-level lateral competition in the same way TRACE does.
- TRACE explicitly models lateral inhibition and competition at the word level, as well as at smaller scales (features and phonemes). The presence of competitive dynamics among words is a core mechanism that helps explain how viewers perceive continuous speech by selecting among competing lexical items.
- Given that TRACE includes word-level competition, and the IA model does not hinge on that same mechanism at the word level, the claim that only the IA model contains word-level lateral inhibition is false.

In summary, both models employ competitive processes, including at the word level in TRACE, so the statement misattributes the existence of word-level lateral inhibition to only the interactive activation model.

The key difference between the interactive activation model of reading and the TRACE model of speech perception is that only the former contains lateral inhibition at the word level. 单项选择题

类似问题

What has been considered to be a key limitation of connectionist models of language acquisition?

What has been considered to be a key limitation of connectionist models of language acquisition?

Which of the following is a connectionist model proposing that concepts are represented by activity that is spread across a network?

What has been considered to be a key limitation of connectionist models of language acquisition?

The key difference between the interactive activation model of reading and the TRACE model of speech perception is that only the former contains lateral inhibition at the word level.

In the colonies of Victoria and New South Wales, when was Gold discovered?[Fill in the blank]

The Torres Strait Islanders belong to the islands north of which state?[Fill in the blank]

In Australia, voting is compulsory in what elections?[Fill in the blank]

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单