A classical-liberal critique of the welfare state focuses on incentives, fiscal risks, coercive redistribution, and effects on civil society.From this classical-liberal perspective, what is the main moral concern about large-scale welfare-state redistribution?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Classical liberalism prioritizes individual liberty, private property, and consent, so the central moral worry is when the state uses coercive power to reassign resources without voluntary agreement.

1. Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Individual liberty and property rights: people have moral claims over what they earn or own.
- Coercion vs. voluntary exchange: taxation is non-consensual taking enforced by the state.
- Civil society and voluntary charity: classical liberals value community institutions arising from free associations rather than state mandates.
- Incentive effects and dependency: large transfers can change behavior and social norms.

2. Step-by-step reasoning
- Premise A: Classical liberals view forced taking (coercion) as morally problematic because it violates individual autonomy and property rights.
- Premise B: Welfare-state redistribution is implemented through taxation, which is compulsory rather than voluntary.
- Premise C: When the state reallocates resources, it replaces private, voluntary decisions (charity, contracts) with centrally imposed transfers and can crowd out civic institutions.
- Conclusion: Therefore the primary moral objection is that taxation-backed transfers blur the boundary between voluntary charity and coercion by using state power to take from some to give to others.

3. Calculations/intermediate steps
- Not applicable (conceptual reasoning rather than numeric computation).

4. Why the correct answer is correct
Answer d states the moral concern directly: redistribution is supported by compulsory taxation, which classical liberals see as coercive and morally distinct from voluntary giving. This infringes on individual autonomy and can weaken voluntary social bonds.

5. Why the other options are incorrect
- a is wrong: classical liberals do not claim all taxation is morally perfect; they are skeptical of coercive state power.
- b is wrong: the worry is the opposite — that voluntary charity will be crowded out, not that people will over-give.
- c is wrong: classical-liberal critique argues welfare can weaken families and civil society, not strengthen them.

6. Conclusion
The correct answer is d: That taxation-backed transfers blur the line between voluntary charity and coercion, using state power to take from some to give to others. This matches the provided answer.

A classical-liberal critique of the welfare state focuses on incentives, fiscal risks, coercive redistribution, and effects on civil society.From this classical-liberal perspective, what is the main moral concern about large-scale welfare-state redistribution?单项选择题

类似问题

How did Egyptian culture and governance change during the Ptolemaic period compared to the pharaonic period?

Name the Supreme Court decision that removed financial constraints on PACs.

Political scientists Joshua Kalla and David Broockman find that senior policy makers made themselves available to _____ between three and four times more often than they did to constituents.

Name the political scientist who argues that parties are designed to serve the needs of ambitious politicians (namely candidates and officeholders).

Name the political scientist who said this famous quote about the problems of pluralism: “The flaw in the pluralist heaven is that the heavenly choir sings with a strong upper-class accent.”

What is the name of the third party candidate in 2000 who was not allowed to participate in the presidential debates? Hint: We watched a video clip with him in class.

E.E. Schattshneider said, "Democracy is ________ save in terms of the parties."

Who was the most recently appointed justice to the Supreme Court?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单