Why is the following code considered bad practice, despite compiling and running without errors?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Using unconditional jumps (GOTO) undermines structured programming and makes code harder to read and maintain, so this code is poor style. Relevant knowledge points: - Structured programming favors high-level control constructs (FOR, IF, EXIT, RETURN) over GOTO. - In PL/SQL a GOTO and labels are legal, so the code compiles and runs even though it uses a jump. - Variables: total is explicitly initialized (total NUMBER := 0;), so there is no initialization bug. Step-by-step execution (complete reasoning and intermediate values): - total starts at 0. - FOR i IN 1..5 LOOP: - i = 1: total := 0 + 1 = 1 → IF total > 10? No. - i = 2: total := 1 + 2 = 3 → IF total > 10? No. - i = 3: total := 3 + 3 = 6 → IF total > 10? No. - i = 4: total := 6 + 4 = 10 → IF total > 10? No (10 is not greater than 10). - i = 5: total := 10 + 5 = 15 → IF total > 10? Yes → GOTO end_process. - Execution jumps to the label <> and prints total (15). The loop is exited by the jump. Why the correct answer is correct: - The GOTO abruptly breaks normal structured control flow, hiding the exit logic and making it harder for a reader to follow program behavior, reason about correctness, or modify later. A clearer structured alternative is to use EXIT WHEN total > 10; inside the loop or return from a subprogram. Such alternatives preserve block structure and readability. Why the other options are incorrect: - "GOTO cannot be used inside FOR loops": false here — PL/SQL allows GOTO and labels; legality is not the issue. - "It uses NULL statements incorrectly": no NULL statements are present or misused. - "total is not initialized properly": false — total is explicitly initialized to 0. Therefore the best answer is: It reduces readability and structured control flow clarity. This matches the provided correct answer.

Why is the following code considered bad practice, despite compiling and running without errors?单项选择题

类似问题

What is an advantage of including comments or internal documentation in a program's code?

Why should programmers write clean code?

"Writing readable code is only important for large-scale projects." True or false?

Which of the following are practices of writing readable code? Select all that apply.

Which of the following statements is INCORRECT?

Commenting and proper indentation are important tools that can increase readability and understanding of your code and should always be used.

Which of the following trees corresponds to a potential parse of the ambiguous sentence below, with correct syntactic categories? Some diagnostics are provided.

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单