Some people say that since we can’t even predict the weather next week, it is impossible to predict climate change in the next century. This is an example of

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Conflating weather and climate is a category error that underlies climate change denial: short-term weather unpredictability does not imply inability to project long-term climate trends.

1) Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Weather = the state of the atmosphere at a specific time and place (temperature, precipitation, winds) and is chaotic; reliable deterministic forecasts are generally limited to about a week or two.
- Climate = the long-term statistical distribution of weather (averages, extremes, trends) over decades to centuries; climate projections use physical models, greenhouse gas scenarios, and statistics to estimate changes in mean and variability.
- Scientific reasoning: different questions require different methods. Short-term forecasting and long-term projection are distinct problems; uncertainty in initial conditions matters for weather but not for the forced trend from increased greenhouse gases.

2) Step-by-step reasoning
- The claim: “Because we can’t reliably predict weather next week, we can’t predict climate next century.”
- Step 1: Identify the conflation — the claim treats weather forecasts and climate projections as the same kind of prediction.
- Step 2: Explain the difference — weather is dominated by chaotic sensitivity to initial conditions, whereas climate change projections are driven by external forcings (e.g., greenhouse gas concentrations) that shift statistical properties over long periods.
- Step 3: Conclude that failing to forecast specific daily weather does not invalidate models that estimate long-term averages and trends.

3) Calculations
- No numerical calculations are required; the distinction is conceptual and methodological.

4) Why the correct answer is correct
- Labeling this statement as “climate change denial” is appropriate because it rejects or dismisses mainstream climate science by using a misleading comparison; it’s a common rhetorical tactic used to undermine confidence in climate projections.

5) Why the other option is incorrect
- “Climate change mitigation” refers to actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions or enhance sinks; it describes policy responses, not a type of argument or denial tactic. Therefore it does not fit the statement.

6) Conclusion
- The provided answer, climate change denial, is correct and matches the explanation above.

Some people say that since we can’t even predict the weather next week, it is impossible to predict climate change in the next century. This is an example of 单项选择题

类似问题

What is the most current trend in those interested in supporting the continued widespread use of fossil fuels?

You own a bond that pays $64 in interest annually. The face value is $1,000 and the current market price is $1,021.61. The bond matures in 11 years. What is the yield to maturity?

Which of the following statements is CORRECT?

It will cost $9,600 to acquire an ice cream cart that is expected to produce cash inflows of $3,600 a year for three years. After the three years, the cart is expected to be worthless. What is the payback period?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单