Your model has 99% accuracy after taking the predictions on test data. Which of the following is true in such a case?

1 Accuracy is not a good metric for imbalanced class problems.

2 Accuracy is a good metric for imbalanced class problems.

3 Precision and recall metrics are good for imbalanced class problems.

4 Precision and recall metrics aren’t good for imbalanced class problems.

Question

Your model has 99% accuracy after taking the predictions on test data. Which of the following is true in such a case?

1 Accuracy is not a good metric for imbalanced class problems.

2 Accuracy is a good metric for imbalanced class problems.

3 Precision and recall metrics are good for imbalanced class problems.

4 Precision and recall metrics aren’t good for imbalanced class problems.

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

1) Relevant knowledge points and concepts
Accuracy = (TP + TN) / (TP + TN + FP + FN). In imbalanced-class problems (one class far more frequent), accuracy can be dominated by the majority-class correct predictions and therefore be misleading. Precision = TP / (TP + FP) measures correctness among positive predictions. Recall (sensitivity) = TP / (TP + FN) measures how many actual positives are found. Precision and recall (and F1) focus on the minority/positive class and are therefore more informative for imbalanced settings.

2) Step-by-step reasoning
If your dataset is heavily imbalanced, a classifier that always predicts the majority class will achieve high accuracy but fail to identify minority-class instances. Therefore high accuracy alone does not imply good performance on the minority class. Precision and recall directly quantify performance on the positive/minority class and reveal failures that accuracy conceals.

3) Calculations and intermediate steps (concrete example)
Assume 1,000 test samples with 1% positive (10 positives) and 990 negatives. A trivial classifier predicts “negative” for every sample:
- TP = 0 (no positives predicted correctly)
- FN = 10 (all positives missed)
- TN = 990
- FP = 0
Accuracy = (TP + TN) / 1000 = (0 + 990) / 1000 = 0.99 = 99%
Precision = TP / (TP + FP) = 0 / 0 → effectively 0 (no positive predictions)
Recall = TP / (TP + FN) = 0 / 10 = 0
This shows 99% accuracy while precision and recall are zero → accuracy is not a reliable indicator here.

4) Why the correct answer is correct
Statement 1 (“Accuracy is not a good metric for imbalanced class problems”) is true because accuracy can be dominated by the majority class. Statement 3 (“Precision and recall metrics are good for imbalanced class problems”) is true because they directly evaluate how well the minority class is detected and how many positive predictions are correct.

5) Why other options are incorrect
Statement 2 is false: accuracy can be misleading on imbalanced data. Statement 4 is false: precision and recall are in fact appropriate metrics for imbalanced problems.

6) Conclusion
The correct choice is “1 and 3,” which matches the provided answer.

类似问题

Match each scenario (Column A) with the correct interpretation. 1: A model predicts all instances as positive. 2: A system flags very few positives, but most flagged cases are correct. 3: A model detects almost all actual positives but also produces many false alarms.

The confusion matrix is used to:

PayFlow has a 2.1% fraud rate (highly imbalanced). Customer Support is overwhelmed with false positive complaints, but Fraud Ops demands you catch every fraud case. Which metric will you optimize for? Current tokens: [based on Q1 choice, please track them yourself]

Which of the following are appropriate ways to evaluate the performance of a Support Vector Machine (SVM) used for classification? (Select all that apply)

Which indicators are used for model evaluation in classification? (Select all that apply)

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单