Question at position 30 Which is the correct order of time for these events? She developed a strong interest in technology → She moved to Brazil → She became known for her TED TalkShe became known for her TED Talk → She applied to MIT → She moved to BrazilShe became known for her TED Talk → She grew up in Brazil → She applied to MITShe developed a strong interest in technology→ She studied at MIT → She worked on many projects and traveled to share her message

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Let's lay out the question clearly and examine each proposed sequence in turn, matching logical progression of a typical tech-focused biography.
Option 1: 'She developed a strong interest in technology → She moved to Brazil → She became known for her TED Talk'
This path places a move to Brazil after developing interest, followed by TED Talk recognition. While plausible in a general sense, the sequence skips any indication of formal education or early career steps that often precede widespread recognition, such as advanced study or project work. It also sets up the TED Talk before any demonstrated broader impact, which slightly disrupts a typical career arc.
Option 2: 'She became known for her TED Talk → She applied to MIT → She moved to Brazil'
Here, fame from a TED Talk precedes applying to MIT and moving to Brazil. This sequencing is unusual because one would typically pursue education (MIT) before achieving notable recognition that could propel further opportunities, not after being widely known. The later move to Brazil also lacks a clear cause-and-effect connection to the TED Talk fame, making the chain feel less coherent.
Option 3: 'She became known for her TED Talk → She grew up in Brazil → She applied to MIT'
This option starts with TED Talk recognition, then retroactively places childhood in Brazil, and then applies to MIT. The chronological inconsistency is evident: growing up in Brazil would logically precede any national or international recognition, and applying to MIT would generally come after foundational education. The order disrupts a natural life timeline.
Option 4: 'She developed a strong interest in technology → She studied at MIT → She worked on many projects and traveled to share her message'
This sequence begins with interest in technology, then education at MIT, followed by ongoing project work and dissemination of ideas. It presents a coherent, plausible progression: cultivate interest, pursue formal study at a prestigious institution, then leverage that education through projects and outreach. The latter part—working on projects and traveling to share a message—fits a typical trajectory of someone using MIT training to impact a broader audience.
In evaluating the options, we look for a logical, pedagogically plausible career arc: early interest, followed by formal study, then applied work and outreach. Option 4 best matches that progression, while Options 1–3 introduce ordinal jumps or reversals that weaken the coherence of a biography’s timeline.
Overall, the reasoning across these choices emphasizes consistency in cause-and-effect sequencing, the natural order of education before recognition or broad impact, and a clear throughline from interest to study to actions and outreach. The comparisons highlight why the other options misplace moments in time or assume improbable causal order. The chosen sequence aligns with a typical, coherent narrative of development in technology-focused work and public engagement.

类似问题

Which document organization structure would you use to outline or highlight the progress of a project or a step-by-step procedure?

What organizational pattern does this speech follow? I. Planting the seeds to grow pineapples II. Taking care of pineapple plants when they are growing III. How they harvest the Pineapple when it is ripe

How did Egyptian culture and governance change during the Ptolemaic period compared to the pharaonic period?

Name the Supreme Court decision that removed financial constraints on PACs.

Political scientists Joshua Kalla and David Broockman find that senior policy makers made themselves available to _____ between three and four times more often than they did to constituents.

Name the political scientist who argues that parties are designed to serve the needs of ambitious politicians (namely candidates and officeholders).

Name the political scientist who said this famous quote about the problems of pluralism: “The flaw in the pluralist heaven is that the heavenly choir sings with a strong upper-class accent.”

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单