The information in the case record indicates that some or all of the case is no longer considered to be ‘good law’

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Citator signals such as "overruled," "reversed," "vacated," or "questioned" show that all or part of a case is no longer considered good law.

1. Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- "Good law" means a case’s precedent remains valid and authoritative for legal reasoning.
- Case records (and legal citators like Shepard’s or KeyCite) include subsequent history and treatment annotations that indicate how later courts or authorities treated the decision.
- Treatment can be negative (overruled, reversed, criticized, limited) or positive (followed, cited approvingly).

2. Step-by-step reasoning
- Step 1: Examine the case record’s subsequent history and treatment entries.
- Step 2: Identify any negative treatment terms (e.g., overruled, reversed, vacated, criticized, limited).
- Step 3: Determine scope: some treatments (e.g., "limited" or "distinguished") may affect only part of the holding; stronger terms (e.g., "overruled") negate the case broadly.
- Step 4: Conclude whether some or all of the case is no longer good law based on the presence and nature of these annotations.

3. Intermediate steps (illustrative, not numerical)
- Find citator flag: e.g., "Overruled by X v. Y" → full negative treatment → not good law.
- Find selective limitation: e.g., "Distinguished by Z" → only certain points are limited → partial loss of good-law status.

4. Why the correct answer is correct
The statement asserts that the information in the case record indicates that some or all of the case is no longer considered good law. That is precisely what citator and subsequent-history annotations do: they inform users when later authority has undermined, limited, or overturned the case. Therefore the statement is true.

5. Why the other option is incorrect
Selecting "False" would mean case records do not indicate when a case is no longer good law, which contradicts the function of citators and subsequent-history entries in legal databases. These records explicitly provide that information.

6. Conclusion
Because case records/citators explicitly record negative treatment indicating partial or total loss of precedential value, the correct answer is True. This matches the provided answer.

The information in the case record indicates that some or all of the case is no longer considered to be ‘good law’判断题

类似问题

On what page of the CLR volume does the judgment of Brennan J begin?

Case law is not another name for the common law.

You own a bond that pays $64 in interest annually. The face value is $1,000 and the current market price is $1,021.61. The bond matures in 11 years. What is the yield to maturity?

Which of the following statements is CORRECT?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单