Did Lucas’s request for an extension violate academic integrity?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks whether Lucas’s request for an extension violated academic integrity, so we need to evaluate what each option claims about integrity and the extendability of permission.
Option 1: 'Yes - simply asking for an extension is unfair, regardless of the reason.' This view is overly broad. Academic integrity concerns honesty and fairness in academic work, but requesting an extension can be a legitimate action if done transparently and following policy. The mere act of asking for more time is not automatically unfair or a breach of integrity; what matters is the truthfulness of the reason and adherence to established procedures.
Option 2: 'No - The extension does not hurt anyone, and Professor Nguyen will never know.' This reasoning relies on the assumption that an integrity issue only exists if someone is harmed or if there is knowledge of the action. In academic integrity, honesty and adherence to rules are key even if no one is directly harmed or if it is not discovered. The lack of discovered harm does not absolve potential dishonesty or policy violations.
Option 3: 'No - it’s not the professor’s business why Lucas needs an extension and Lucas’ relationship with his friends and families are just as important as the paper.' This argument shifts the focus from integrity and policy to personal reasons about life priorities. While personal circumstances can be relevant to extensions (e.g., documented illness), integrity policies typically require truthful disclosure and proper documentation. The claim that the professor’s business is limited to the assignment itself ignores the role of legitimate, verifiable reasons in extension requests.
Option 4: 'Yes - Lucas is lying about being sick, making the extension unfair and a fabrication.' This stance asserts dishonesty about the stated reason, which would constitute an integrity violation if Lucas knowingly misrepresented illness to obtain an extension. If Lucas falsely claimed illness to gain favor or avoid penalties, that constitutes deception and undermines fairness and trust in the academic process.
Across the options, a key distinction is whether the reason for the extension is truthful and whether proper procedures are followed. Options 1 and 2 rely on absolute judgments about fairness or knowledge; option 3 appeals to personal importance without detailing policy alignment; option 4 centers on dishonesty in the stated reason, which is a direct integrity concern. In evaluating integrity, the most defensible position is that false claims to receive an extension undermine integrity, while truthful, well-documented requests aligned with policy preserve it. However, since the prompt asks for reasoning without declaring a final answer, this analysis highlights the strengths and weaknesses of each choice and how they align with common academic integrity standards.

Did Lucas’s request for an extension violate academic integrity?单项选择题

类似问题

I can submit work from a different class to fulfill course requirements without engaging in academic misconduct.

Allowing others to complete paper assignments, whether it is paid or not, counts as cheating.

I agree to abide by Pacific's Honor Code before beginning this exam.

Cheating on the placement assessment could result in enrollment into a course that is too difficult, or not challenging enough, potentially costing time and money.

Cheating on the placement assessment could result in enrollment into a course that is too difficult, or not challenging enough, potentially costing time and money.

Repeated instances of plagiarism can result in failure in the course and expulsion from the college.

I acknowledge and agree to uphold the BYU CE Academic Integrity Policy and all exam rules and proctoring guidelines.

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单