What is incorrect with the tree below? You can use the following example sentence to guide your analysis.

Example: The frequent misspellings generated many misunderstandings

Question

What is incorrect with the tree below? You can use the following example sentence to guide your analysis.

Example: The frequent misspellings generated many misunderstandings

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Derivational and inflectional morpheme order: mis- attaches to the verb stem first to form a prefixed verb (misspell / misunderstand), then -ing forms the deverbal noun/gerund (misspelling / understanding), and finally plural -s attaches to that noun. The tree in the figure represents exactly that ordering: prefix mis- is merged with the verbal base before -ing is combined, -ing yields a noun, and -s pluralizes that noun.

Step-by-step reasoning:
1) Identify morpheme sequence in the example words.
   - misspellings = mis- + spell + -ing + -s
   - misunderstandings = mis- + understand + -ing + -s
2) Apply morphological composition order:
   - First combine mis- with the verb root (mis- + spell → misspell; mis- + understand → misunderstand).
   - Next apply -ing to the resulting verb to form the nominal/gerund (misspell → misspelling; misunderstand → understanding).
   - Finally attach plural -s to the noun (misspelling → misspellings; understanding → misunderstandings).
3) Confirm the tree: the left prefix (mis-) is attached at the verb-level before the -ing affix; the -ing affix is in the verbal-to-nominal position; the right-side affix -s attaches to the nominal node. This matches the morpheme order above.

Why the correct answer is “None of these”:
- Option 1 (“mis- should combine with ‘spell’ before combining ‘-ing’”): This is true as a general principle, but the tree already reflects that ordering; therefore it is not an error in the tree.
- Option 2 (“-s attaches to verbs, not nouns”): False — plural -s is an inflectional nominal pluralizer that attaches to nouns, so this statement is incorrect and not a problem with the tree.
- Option 3 (“‘understand’ can be further broken down into ‘under’ and ‘stand’”): Morphologically, “understand” is historically complex but in current morphological analysis it functions as a bound lexical root; treating it as decomposable here would be misleading. The tree’s treatment of understand as the verbal base is appropriate.
- Option 4 (“The base ‘understanding’ is a verb, not a noun”): In the sentence “many misunderstandings” the -ing form is a nominal (deverbal noun) that is pluralized; so the tree correctly treats understanding as a noun before -s attaches.

Conclusion: None of the listed criticisms correctly identifies an error in the tree; the tree correctly represents mis- attaching to the verb before -ing, -ing forming a noun, and -s pluralizing that noun. Final answer: None of these.

What is incorrect with the tree below? You can use the following example sentence to guide your analysis. Example: The frequent misspellings generated many misunderstandings单项选择题

类似问题

Which of the following words have only one root?

Which of the following sentences does not contain an endocentric compound?

Match each morphological term with the example that illustrates it. 1: Derivational prefix 2: Productive suffix 3: Derivational suffix 4: Inflectional suffix 5: Endocentric compound 6: Exocentric compound

The adjective is 'capable'. Type in the noun form:

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单