Professor Martin Hilbert believes which of the following about the role of technology as a tool?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: Professor Martin Hilbert believes which of the following about the role of technology as a tool?

Option 1: "The main bias of technology is beneficial to society." This claim suggests that technology itself is biased toward positive societal outcomes. However, this overstates a single directional bias and ignores the nuanced view that technology can produce both benefits and harms depending on context, usage, and governance. The statement inaccurately frames bias as inherently beneficial, which is not a standard or widely accepted summary of Hilbert's position.

Option 2: "Technology is neither good nor bad." This option captures a common, value-neutral perspective of technology as a tool whose moral valence depends on human choices and applications. It emphasizes agency and context, aligning with the idea that technology is a neutral instrument rather than an inherently ethical entity. This framing avoids ascribing intrinsic morality to technology itself and focuses on how it is used.

Option 3: "Digital technology is inherently highly dangerous." This extreme view claims an intrinsic danger in digital tech, neglecting the wide range of safe, beneficial, and transformative uses of technology. It ignores the constructive roles that digital tools can play in communication, health, education, and collaboration, and misrepresents the spectrum of outcomes associated with technology.

Option 4: none of the above This option would be true only if none of the preceding statements matched Hilbert’s stance. Given that Option 2 does reflect a familiar neutral-tool view attributed to discussions in technology ethics, this choice would be inaccurate.

Additional note: The core misunderstanding in Options 1, 3, and 4 stems from either attributing a unilateral bias to technology, declaring universal danger, or rejecting all listed positions without recognizing the common neutral-tool characterization. The nuanced position is that technology itself is a tool whose impact is determined by usage, policy, and societal choices, rather than being innately good, bad, or universally dangerous.

Professor Martin Hilbert believes which of the following about the role of technology as a tool?Single choice

Similar Questions

What was the world's first widely adopted biodiversity policy?

The aim of the Paris Agreement is to ensure that the earth’s preindustrial temperature is not exceeded by more than º Celsius.

The IPCC's mission is to Blank ______.

Why have most international agreements for environmental protection been based on the honor system?

As was exhibited with the Montreal Protocol and the encouragement of reduced CFC production, trade can be an effective tool to compel compliance with international treaties.

The Stockholm Declaration and UNEP were the result of the Blank ______ first conference on the Human Environment in 1972.

In addition to the direct mission of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), why was CITES so important?

President Trump hiring a corporate leader from the oil and gas industry to head the Department of Energy is an example of regulatory ; one intention behind this was to change environmental policy.

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler