Which of the following best describes the relation of money to subjective well-being?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Money increases life satisfaction and reduces hardship, but its benefits are neither unlimited nor unconditional. Behavioral economics and happiness research show that income buys security and opportunities (basic needs, health care, leisure), yet people adapt and compare themselves to others, producing diminishing returns and potential harms when money becomes the primary value.

1. Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Subjective well-being: includes both life evaluation (overall satisfaction) and affect (daily positive/negative emotions).
- Diminishing marginal utility of income: each extra dollar yields smaller increases in well-being.
- Hedonic adaptation and social comparison: people return to baseline happiness and judge themselves relative to others.
- Materialism: overvaluing money/possessions is associated with lower well-being and poorer relationships.
- Empirical findings (e.g., Easterlin paradox; Kahneman & Deaton): income raises life satisfaction and reduces stress up to a point; excessive focus on money can reduce happiness.

2. Step-by-step reasoning
- Step 1: Recognize money meets needs and reduces stress → positive effect on well-being.
- Step 2: Recognize diminishing returns and adaptation → more money yields smaller marginal gains.
- Step 3: Recognize social comparison and materialism → if a person overvalues money, relationships and values suffer, reducing happiness.
- Step 4: Combine these points to conclude money can boost happiness but doesn’t guarantee it and can interfere if valued too highly.

3. Intermediate steps/calculations
- No numerical calculation is required; reasoning proceeds qualitatively from empirical patterns: positive effect (basic needs) → diminishing returns (lesser incremental benefit) → potential negative effects (materialism).

4. Why the correct answer is correct
The chosen option captures both the positive role of money (boosting happiness by meeting needs) and the limits/risks (diminishing returns, interference when money is overly prioritized). This aligns with broad empirical literature.

5. Why other options are incorrect
- Option 1 (money interferes; rich are less happy): too absolute and contradicted by evidence that income generally raises life satisfaction.
- Option 3 (money boosts happiness; poor rarely happy): overstates effect and ignores adaptation and nonmaterial sources of happiness.
- Option 4 (boosts only for high materialism): wrong direction—materialism often undermines well-being rather than enabling money’s benefits.

6. Conclusion
The correct answer is: "Money can boost happiness, but it does not guarantee it, and can interfere with happiness if a person values money too much." This matches the provided answer.

Which of the following best describes the relation of money to subjective well-being?单项选择题

类似问题

Psychologists studying subjective well being note that happiness is related to

Question at position 16 What is the name of the scientific term used to describe how people experience the quality of their lives in terms of life satisfaction?relationship satisfactionlife confidencehappinesssubjective well-beingsocial integration

Which of the following components are measured by psychologists interested in subjective well-being?

Which of the following is NOT a finding of Stevenson and Wolfers (2013)?

Question at position 15 Sufficient material and social resources, as well as living in a desirable society, are three external (or ______) influences of subjective well-being.gestalttop-downbottom-upconstructiviststructuralist

A project has a required return of 12.6 percent, an initial cash outflow of $42,100, and cash inflows of $16,500 in Year 1, $11,700 in Year 2, and $10,400 in Year 4. What is the net present value?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单