Which of the following statements about Stonehenge is true?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The station stones may have been used to mark the position of lunar standstill.

1. Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Stonehenge contains different stone settings: station stones (four stones forming a rectangle), the Aubrey Holes (a ring of pits), bluestones (inner horseshoe), and the trilithon horseshoe (large sarsen uprights).  
- The Moon’s declination cycles with an 18.6-year period producing “major” and “minor” lunar standstills, when moonrise and moonset reach extreme northerly or southerly positions on the horizon.  
- Archaeoastronomy compares monument geometry with these celestial extremes to infer intended alignments.

2. Step-by-step reasoning
- The station stones are placed roughly on the circumference and form a rectangle whose sightlines point toward the horizon extremes where the Moon would rise or set at its major and minor standstills.  
- Observers and researchers (e.g., Gerald Hawkins, later studies) found that alignments from the central area through pairs of station stones coincide with those lunar extreme azimuths.  
- Because these positions correspond to predictable extremes of the Moon’s path, the simplest interpretation is that the station stones functioned as markers of lunar standstills.

3. Calculations / intermediate steps
- (No numeric calculation here.) The matching is geometric/astronomical: measured azimuths of station-stone sightlines align with computed azimuths of moonrise/moonset for major/minor standstills at Stonehenge’s latitude.

4. Why the correct answer is correct
- The physical layout and measured sightlines of the station stones match the known azimuths for lunar standstills. That correspondence supports the cautious phrasing “may have been used,” reflecting archaeological evidence consistent with, but not proving, intentional lunar marking.

5. Why the other options are incorrect
- “Aubrey Holes were definitely used to predict solar and lunar eclipses.” This is too strong: Hawkins once suggested eclipse prediction via a counting scheme, but the claim is speculative and not definitively supported.  
- “The bluestone horseshoe may have been oriented to point at the North Star at the time of construction.” The bluestones are arranged toward solstitial alignments; pole-star orientation is not supported and the pole star changed over millennia, making such a claim unsupported.  
- “The trilithon horseshoe marks the equinox sunrise.” The principal axis of Stonehenge aligns with midsummer sunrise/southwinter sunset (solstice), not the equinox.

6. Conclusion
- The evidence and alignments support the provided answer: The station stones may have been used to mark the position of lunar standstill.

Which of the following statements about Stonehenge is true?单项选择题

类似问题

Which feature of Stonehenge most clearly demonstrates intentional solar alignment rather than chance orientation?

Which of these is not a part of Stonehenge?

A project has a required return of 12.6 percent, an initial cash outflow of $42,100, and cash inflows of $16,500 in Year 1, $11,700 in Year 2, and $10,400 in Year 4. What is the net present value?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单