Reinhart points out that if a researcher runs an experiment and collects a huge sample of data then there is a high chance that they will find a statistically significant value for p when they do the analysis. This implies that:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question discusses Reinhart’s point about large-sample studies yielding statistically significant p-values even when the practical significance may be questionable, which leads to the need for judgement in interpretation.
Option 1: 'It is not possible to interpret experiments with huge samples' This overstates the issue; interpretation is still possible, but requires careful judgement about what the p-value implies in context, effect sizes, and study design.
Option 2: 'It is better to run experiments with small samples' This is not a supported general guideline. Small samples can lead to imprecise estimates and low power, while large samples can inflate even trivial effects; the optimal sample size depends on the research question, power analysis, and practical constraints, not a blanket preference for small samples.
Option 3: 'p values are not useful' This is incorrect. P-values are useful for hypothesis testing, but they must be interpreted in context, considering effect size, confidence intervals, and study design; they are not the sole arbiter of truth.
Option 4: 'Interpreting the results of statistical tests requires judgement' This captures the nuance highlighted by Reinhart: large samples increase the chance of finding statistically significant p-values, so researchers must use judgment to assess practical significance, effect sizes, confidence intervals, and the broader context.
Option 5: 'Only experiments with huge samples can be interpreted' This is false; interpretation is possible across sample sizes, though the evidentiary strength and precision vary with sample size.

Reinhart points out that if a researcher runs an experiment and collects a huge sample of data then there is a high chance that they will find a statistically significant value for p when they do the analysis. This implies that:单项选择题

类似问题

Which variables were significant in your model? (Use an alpha of 10% to draw your conclusions.)

A researcher conducts a study and finds a statistically significant difference between two groups. Which of the following statements is NOT necessarily true?

Based on the information provided in Q1, which of the following is true?

With large sample sizes, even small differences between the null value and the observed point estimate, a difference often called the effect size, will be identified as statistically significant.

What does it mean for results to be statistically significant?

Reinhart points out that if a researcher runs an experiment and collects a huge sample of data then there is a high chance that they will find a statistically significant value for p when they do the analysis. This implies that:

Martin has found a correlation of r =.18 between the two variables of using prescription stimulants (e.g., Adderall) and frontal lobe activity. This correlation is more likely to be statistically significant if

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单