You are tasked with identifying all ORDER# from the ORDERITEMS table where the total (quantity * paideach) for that order is greater than the total amount due for every order placed by customers in the 'FL' state. Which of the following queries correctly uses a multiple-row subquery to achieve this?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

SUM(quantity * paideach) per order is the key aggregate, and to compare that aggregate to every FL order total you must: (1) compute per-order totals for FL customers in a subquery that returns multiple rows, (2) use the ALL predicate so the outer total is greater than every value returned, and (3) apply the comparison in HAVING because the outer expression is an aggregate.

Relevant knowledge points:
- Aggregate functions and GROUP BY: SUM(quantity * paideach) gives total per order.
- HAVING vs WHERE: HAVING filters after grouping (required when comparing aggregates).
- Multiple-row subqueries and ALL: expression > ALL(subquery) means the expression is greater than every value produced by the subquery. ANY would mean greater than at least one value (not what we want).

Step-by-step reasoning:
1. Outer query: compute total per order from orderitems:
   SELECT order#, SUM(quantity * paideach) "Total_Amount_Due" FROM orderitems GROUP BY order#
2. Subquery: compute totals for orders placed by customers in state = 'FL'. Join customers → orders → orderitems and GROUP BY order# to get one total per FL order:
   SELECT SUM(quantity * paideach)
   FROM customers JOIN orders USING (customer#) JOIN orderitems USING (order#)
   WHERE state = 'FL' GROUP BY order#
   This returns multiple totals (one per FL order).
3. Compare the outer order total to every returned FL order total using > ALL inside HAVING:
   HAVING SUM(quantity * paideach) > ALL ( ...subquery... )

Why the correct answer is correct:
- It computes the outer aggregate, computes the set of FL order totals, and enforces the outer total is greater than every element of that set using > ALL in HAVING — exactly the requested logic.

Why other options are incorrect (brief):
- Using ANY would return orders greater than at least one FL order, not greater than every FL order.
- Placing SUM(...) comparison in WHERE is invalid because WHERE cannot reference aggregates.
- Wrapping SUM inside MAX(SUM(...)) is an invalid aggregate-of-aggregate usage without an additional nesting level; the shown form is incorrect.

Conclusion: The provided query using HAVING ... > ALL (subquery grouped by order# for FL) is correct and matches the given answer.

Similar Questions

A type of query that is placed within a WHERE or HAVING clause of another query is called a:

Based on the contents of the BOOKS table, which line of the following SQL statement contains an error? 1 SELECT isbn, title, pubid, cost, retail 2 FROM books 3 WHERE (pubid, cost) = 4 (SELECT pubid, MIN(cost) 5 FROM books 6 GROUP BY pubid); BOOKS table:

Question at position 55 Subqueries can only be used in the WHERE clause.TrueFalse

Question at position 54 When EXISTS or NOT EXISTS is used in a subquery, the select list of the subquery will usually just select all columns as a placeholder because it doesn't matter which columns are returned.TrueFalse

Question at position 54 When EXISTS or NOT EXISTS is used in a subquery, the select list of the subquery will usually just select all columns as a placeholder because it doesn't matter which columns are returned.TrueFalse

Question at position 43 Subqueries can only be used in the WHERE clause.TrueFalse

Question at position 31 Which of the following operator CAN NOT be used with a multiple-row subquery?NOT EXISTANYNOT INBETWEEN

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler