You and your friend see a local news report that claims a species of coral is going to be driven extinct by ocean acidification that results from global warming. Your friend claims “That news story is just an example of sensationalism. Furthermore, it is just one species, and so it’s not that big of a deal.” What is the best response you can make to your friend?

Question

You and your friend see a local news report that claims a species of coral is going to be driven extinct by ocean acidification that results from global warming.  Your friend claims “That news story is just an example of sensationalism. Furthermore, it is just one species, and so it’s not that big of a deal.”  What is the best response you can make to your friend?

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks for the best response to a friend who minimizes a news claim about a coral species facing extinction due to ocean acidification from global warming.
Option 1: “I agree. It’s just one species and the earth has hundreds of billions of other species.” This downplays potential ecological consequences and ignores the idea that the loss of one species can affect others through food webs, ecosystem services, and overall community structure. It also reinforces a misconception that extinction of a single species is inconsequential.
Option 2: “I agree. It is sensational. Global warming is happening so slowly that species are not even really in any danger. They can all simply adapt to higher temperatures.” This choice asserts slow warming and universal adaptation, which are not supported by evidence for many species. It also uses broad generalizations and dismisses credible risks to biodiversity and ecosystem function.
Option 3: “I disagree. Communities are complex, if one species goes extinct we do not know about the wider influence on the entire community and ecosystem.” This response acknowledges ecosystem complexity, recognizes that the extinction of a single species can have cascading effects, and is consistent with ecological principles about species interactions, trophic relationships, and ecosystem services. It counters the sensationalism by focusing on broader ecological consequences and uncertainty in predicting outcomes.
Option 4: “I agree. Coral is really just rocks, so in reality non-living things cannot go extinct.” This is a fundamental misunderstanding: coral organisms are living colonies, and extinction refers to the disappearance of a species, not the inanimate substrate they attach to. Equating coral with rocks reflects incorrect biology and misrepresents the concept of extinction.
In summary, option 3 provides a scientifically literate counterpoint that emphasizes ecosystem complexity and potential wider impacts, while the other options either downplay risk, rely on unsupported generalizations, or rest on incorrect biology.

Similar Questions

The last captive passenger pigeon died in Cincinnati at ______________.

What percentage of all animal and plant species are under threat of becoming extinct due to human activity?

The functional definition of global extinction is:

Name the Supreme Court decision that removed financial constraints on PACs.

Political scientists Joshua Kalla and David Broockman find that senior policy makers made themselves available to _____ between three and four times more often than they did to constituents.

Name the political scientist who argues that parties are designed to serve the needs of ambitious politicians (namely candidates and officeholders).

Name the political scientist who said this famous quote about the problems of pluralism: “The flaw in the pluralist heaven is that the heavenly choir sings with a strong upper-class accent.”

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler