A city government’s smart parking app project has used 65% of the budget at the halfway point because extra developers were hired to catch up. Which of the following is a preventive (proactive) action rather than a corrective (reactive) one?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Preventive actions anticipate and reduce the chance of future problems, while corrective actions respond to and fix problems that have already occurred.

1. Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Preventive (proactive) action: taken before a problem recurs, aiming to remove root causes and reduce risk in future projects (examples: improved requirements, stronger contracts, training).
- Corrective (reactive) action: taken in immediate response to an existing problem to contain, remediate, or recover (examples: reallocating funds, hiring or freezing hiring, reworking failed features).
- Distinguishing feature: timing and intent—preventive changes future process; corrective addresses the current failure.

2. Step-by-step reasoning
Step 1: Describe the situation: at halfway point, 65% of budget is spent because extra developers were hired to catch up—this is a current budget overrun caused by schedule slippage or underestimation.
Step 2: Classify each option by whether it addresses the immediate overrun or future recurrence:
- Reallocate budget from another department: provides funds now to finish development — reactive.
- Freeze hiring to avoid further cost escalation: immediate personnel decision to stop additional spending — reactive/mitigative.
- Improve vendor contract clauses for API delivery in future projects: changes contracting practice to prevent future API delays and the need for catch-up hires — proactive.
- Rework failed features before going live: immediate corrective work to fix defects — reactive.

3. Intermediate logical steps
- The current issue required extra developers (a corrective action already taken). Preventive measures would instead change planning/contracting to avoid the root cause (delayed or missing API delivery).
- Strengthening vendor contracts creates enforceable delivery timelines, acceptance criteria, and penalties or remedies, reducing risk of future overruns.

4. Why the correct answer is correct
Improving vendor contract clauses directly targets the root cause (third-party API delivery failures) and is implemented before future projects begin, thereby preventing recurrence. It is forward-looking and systemic rather than a stopgap.

5. Why other options are incorrect
- Reallocating budget: supplies immediate funds; does not prevent future overruns (reactive).
- Freezing hiring: limits current cost growth but may harm delivery and is reactive.
- Reworking failed features: necessary corrective fix but addresses existing defects, not prevention.

6. Conclusion
The preventive (proactive) action is: Improve vendor contract clauses for API delivery in future projects. This matches the provided answer.

A city government’s smart parking app project has used 65% of the budget at the halfway point because extra developers were hired to catch up. Which of the following is a preventive (proactive) action rather than a corrective (reactive) one?单项选择题

类似问题

Which of the following are examples of useful context for an engineering AI task?

The later in the development life cycle a fault is discovered, the more expensive it is to fix. Why?

What is the best way to prevent design flaws in software?

信息系统解决方案的开发是基于问题解决过程的。

Which statement best describes software engineering?

Which of the following best describes a software development methodology ?

Question at position 3 The steps of the systems development life cycle can only be viewed as a linear process. TrueFalse

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单