For the following pair, select which sentence is EASIER to process, according to memory-based explanations.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: For the following pair, select which sentence is EASIER to process, according to memory-based explanations.

Answer options:
- The professor should approach the student who his classmate pushed yesterday.
- The professor should approach the student who pushed his classmate yesterday.

Option 1 analysis: The sentence 'The professor should approach the student who his classmate pushed yesterday' introduces a possessive pronoun 'his' that competes with the relative clause for a clear antecedent. This can create a temporary ambiguity about whose classmate is being referred to, making the dependency between 'the student who' and 'his classmate' harder to resolve in real time. Memory-based accounts predict slower processing when pronoun resolution is ambiguous or when the relative clause imposes a structurally complex interpretation. Practically, listeners may momentarily misattach 'his' or struggle to identify the intended antecedent, leading to increased processing load.

Option 2 analysis: 'The professor should approach the student who pushed his classmate yesterday' places the relative clause with a clear agent for the verb 'pushed': the student is the one who performed the action. The pronoun 'his' clearly refers to 'the student' within the relative clause, and there is a direct, unambiguous binding of the possessive to its antecedent. This straightforward binding reduces ambiguity and aligns with typical memory-based expectations for ease of processing. The overall structure is simpler: [the student] [who [pushed his classmate yesterday]] with a direct subject–verb relationship parsed in a canonical order, which supports faster retrieval and integration in real time.

Comparative contrast: Option 1 risks a garden-path-like undoing due to the 'whose' reference created by 'his' in combination with the relative clause, whereas Option 2 presents a more transparent dependency: the action is performed by the immediately preceding noun 'the student', making interpretation more incremental and less demanding on memory resources.

In summary, the main source of difficulty in Option 1 is pronoun resolution and potential misattachment within the relative clause, while Option 2 benefits from a clean, unambiguous subject–verb relationship in the relative clause, leading to easier processing according to memory-based explanations.

For the following pair, select which sentence is EASIER to process, according to memory-based explanations.单项选择题

类似问题

From the perspective of the listener, as a person speaks, each sentence often is characterized by ________ until the sentence is completed.

According to the immediacy principle, semantic information is considered after we first process syntax

Which of the following two sentences is expected to be easier to process? (1) What did the friendly lady arrange for in the garage the other day? (2) What did the friendly lady arrange in the big garage the other day?

Which of the following two sentences is expected to be more difficult to process? (1) Which nice event did Andy select at the hotel last night? (2) Which event did Andy select for at the hotel last night?