GreenThumb Gardens is a Sydney nursery company that provides garden supplies to non professional and professional gardeners. It has developed a strategy to improve customers’ shopping gardening experience. This includes providing a wide variety of gardening supplies and free 15 minute gardening consultations to reduce plant mortality rate.

Based on the SAFe framework, which of the following statement is correct?

Question

GreenThumb Gardens is a Sydney nursery company that provides garden supplies to non professional and professional gardeners. It has developed a strategy to improve customers’ shopping gardening experience. This includes providing a wide variety of gardening supplies and free 15 minute gardening consultations to reduce plant mortality rate.

Based on the SAFe framework, which of the following statement is correct?

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: GreenThumb Gardens in Sydney has a strategy to enhance the customer gardening experience by offering a wide variety of supplies and free 15-minute consultations to reduce plant mortality. Based on the SAFe framework, which statement is correct?

Option A: 'A. The new strategy is feasible given the recent trend that more Australians are willing to support local small businesses over large multinational companies.'
- This option appeals to market trends and relative feasibility, but SAFe focuses on delivering customer value through Agile practices and Lean-Agile leadership rather than a high-level trend-based feasibility claim. It does not directly address whether the strategy creates customer value or aligns with Agile Release Train (ART) execution, so it’s an incomplete SAFe justification.

Option B: 'B. The new strategy is acceptable to customers because it will improve their gardening satisfaction and success.'
- This option emphasizes customer value: improving satisfaction and success aligns with SAFe’s emphasis on delivering valuable outcomes to customers and end-users. In SAFe, strategies and programs are judged by their ability to create tangible value for customers, reducing waste (such as plant mortality) and increasing adoption and satisfaction. The rationale here directly connects the strategy to customer value and outcomes, which is central to SAFe principles.

Option C: 'C. The new strategy is NOT suitable given that the nursery does not possess the ability to hire and retain knowledgeable employees who can provide helpful gardening advice to customers.'
- This option highlights a capability gap. While capability matters in SAFe (teams and roles must be able to execute), SAFe would prompt you to address the gap (e.g., invest in training or hire knowledgeable staff) rather than declare the strategy unsuitable from the outset. It signals a risk, but SAFe would typically treat it as something to mitigate rather than a definitive disqualification of the strategy.

Option D: 'D. The new strategy is NOT feasible because it does not allow GreenThumb Gardens to differentiate itself from competitors.'
- This asserts a lack of differentiation. In SAFe terms, differentiation can come from value delivered to customers and unique capabilities (like free 15-minute consultations). Saying it does not differentiate ignores the potential competitive edge gained through enhanced customer outcomes and service. Hence it’s an incorrect assessment of feasibility from a SAFe perspective.

Option E: 'E. The new strategy is suitable given the recent trend that Australians are time poor.'
- This claims suitability based on a market trend (time poverty). While timing and convenience can influence value, SAFe requires that the strategy demonstrably delivers customer value and aligns with the Agile Release Train’s continuous delivery and system thinking. Merely citing a trend without tying it to concrete value delivery makes this claim weak as a SAFe justification.

Putting the analyses together, option B uniquely centers on customer value and outcome improvement, which is the core of SAFe’ s justification for a strategy: it explains why customers would find the strategy valuable and how it improves their success, linking strategy to tangible benefits rather than solely to trends, capabilities, differentiation, or feasibility without value outcomes.

类似问题

For stock A, we have 𝛽 𝑖 = 0.70. Suppose the expected market risk premium next year is 9% and the risk-free rate is 3%. What is the expected return of this stock based on the CAPM? (Please answer in % and round to 2 decimal places. If the answer is 8.057%, then in the box, write 8.06)

The following graph shows the Security Market Line in the current economy. If a stock has a β of 1.2, what is the expected return of this stock based on the CAPM? (Please answer in % and round to 2 decimal places. If the answer is 8.057%, then in the box, write 8.06)

Suppose Apple publicly announces earnings today and the announcement is above market expectations. If markets are semistrong-form efficient, then:

Evidence that investors who trade more often earn lower net returns is most directly related to

Behavioral finance argues that EMH failures require

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单