Not providing your junior research team with a copy of an approved ethics protocol would be an example of which of the following?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Withholding an approved ethics protocol from junior researchers is a clear example of failing to provide adequate guidance on responsible research conduct to those under your supervision.

1. Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Supervisors are responsible for ensuring trainees have access to the documents, procedures and training needed to conduct research ethically and legally (e.g., approved ethics protocols, consent forms, standard operating procedures).  
- An ethics protocol contains required safeguards, procedures and approvals; making it available is part of mentoring and compliance.  
- Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) includes supervision, transparency and documentation sharing.

2. Step-by-step reasoning
- Step 1: Identify the act — not providing a copy of an approved ethics protocol to a junior team.  
- Step 2: Determine expected supervisory duties — provide oversight, access to approvals and clear guidance on how to follow the protocol.  
- Step 3: Match the act to the options — the omission is a failure to provide necessary guidance/materials. It is not a supportive or intentional pedagogical action.

3. Intermediate steps (logical checks)
- Check whether the omission could be framed positively (options b–d). Each positive framing implies benefit (self-sufficiency, time-saving, control) but does not align with obligations to ensure ethical compliance.  
- Confirm that lack of access increases risk of protocol deviations and noncompliance, reinforcing that this is a guidance failure.

4. Why the correct answer is correct
- Option (a) explicitly names the supervisory failure: not giving the approved protocol deprives junior researchers of the guidance and documentation needed to conduct research responsibly and in compliance with ethics approvals.

5. Why other options are incorrect
- (b) Encouraging self-sufficiency: withholding required documents is not mentoring; it creates risk and ignorance, not deliberate training.  
- (c) Avoiding wasting time: ethically required documents are not irrelevant — they are essential.  
- (d) Excellent management: withholding required approvals is poor management and a compliance risk, not evidence of good control.

6. Conclusion
This behavior best fits option (a): Failure to provide adequate guidance on responsible research conduct to researchers under your supervision. This confirms the provided answer.

Not providing your junior research team with a copy of an approved ethics protocol would be an example of which of the following?单项选择题

类似问题

What should you do if your collaborator insists that you give them a copy of the study participants' sensitive data?

The university’s human ethics policy helps protect:

Which of the following must be considered when working with data that was collected from human subjects? Select all that apply.

Debriefing is particularly important in studies involving

Question 30 Choose a, b, c or d as the best answer. The author’s main argument is that the 100:80:100 model __________.

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单