To make a case of wrongful discharge based on promissory estoppel, a former employee must show:

BlackTom题目解析

Question

To make a case of wrongful discharge based on promissory estoppel, a former employee must show:

BlackTom题目解析

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Let's break down the elements of promissory estoppel in the wrongful discharge context and evaluate each choice.
Option 1: 'the employer failed to promise the employee something that they anticipated.' This is vague about what was promised and doesn’t address reliance or detriment; promissory estoppel requires a promise that is reasonably relied upon, not merely anticipation of a promise.
Option 2: 'the employee is reasonably expected to rely on the promise.' Reasonable reliance is a key component, but on its own it is not enough; promissory estoppel also requires that the reliance be to the employee's detriment and that a promise was actually made or intended to be binding.
Option 3: 'the employee is harmed by reliance on the promise.' Harm or detriment due to reliance is essential, yet this option mentions harm in abstract without tying it to a promissory promise and its existence; promissory estoppel requires the promise and the resulting detriment from reliance, not harm alone.
Option 4: 'the former employee relied on that promise to their detriment.' This option combines three crucial pieces: there was a promise, the employee relied on it, and the reliance caused detriment. This aligns with the core doctrine of promissory estoppel in the wrongful discharge setting.
Option 5: 'a promise from the employer or that an authorized representative made a promise.' While establishing that a promise existed and was made by an authorized source is important, this option alone does not mention reliance or detriment, which are also required elements for promissory estoppel.
By evaluating the elements required—existence of a promise, reasonable reliance, and detriment due to reliance—the statement that best captures all essential aspects is the one describing reliance to the employee’s detriment resulting from the promise. This integrates the causal chain from promise to detrimental reliance and aligns with promissory estoppel doctrine in employment contexts.

To make a case of wrongful discharge based on promissory estoppel, a former employee must show: BlackTom题目解析单项选择题

类似问题

Which one of the following is NOT true?

Which one of the following is NOT true?

Which one of the following is NOT true?

Which one of the following is NOT true?

Which one of the following is NOT true?

Jens owes JC Builders $5000. On discovering that JC Builders are in financial difficulty Jens offers to pay them $3,000 in full settlement of the debt. JC Builders agree to accept the $3,000 but a week later, claim the remaining $2,000. Will JC Builders succeed in their claim?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单