A random sample of tweets made by @AucklandUni was obtained. Load the dataset into iNZight Lite using this link and produce relevant summary statistics to answer the questions below. Note: When you are using two categorical variables, the order you put variables into iNZight Lite does affect the frequency table in the summary so consider this carefully. Give your answers as percentages rounded to one decimal place e.g. 23.1% or 42.0%. What proportion of the tweets were tweeted in the afternoon or evening (PM)?[Fill in the blank] % What proportion of the tweets were tweeted between 2015 to 2016?[Fill in the blank] % Of the tweets that were tweeted in the morning (AM), what proportion were tweeted between 2017 to 2018?[Fill in the blank] % Of the tweets that were tweeted between 2015 to 2016, what proportion were tweeted in the afternoon or evening (PM)?[Fill in the blank] % 多项填空题

登录即可查看完整答案

我们收录了全球超50000道真实原题与详细解析,现在登录,立即获得答案。

类似问题

A random sample of tweets made by @AucklandUni was obtained. Load the dataset into iNZight Lite using this link and produce relevant summary statistics to answer the questions below. Note: When you are using two categorical variables, the order you put variables into iNZight Lite does affect the frequency table in the summary so consider this carefully. Give your answers as percentages rounded to one decimal place e.g. 23.1% or 42.0%. What proportion of the tweets used hashtags?[Fill in the blank] % What proportion of the tweets were tweeted between 2019 to 2020?[Fill in the blank] % Of the tweets that used no hashtags, what proportion were tweeted between 2019 to 2020?[Fill in the blank] % Of the tweets that were tweeted between 2021 to 2022, what proportion used hashtags?[Fill in the blank] %

A model was developed to classify whether or not tweets were written by a Twitter bot. The results from using the classification model on 20 tweets are shown below in the confusion matrix.Use the confusion matrix to answer the following questions. Give your answers as percentages rounded to one decimal place e.g. 23.1% or 42.0%.The accuracy of the classification model (PCC) was [Fill in the blank] %.[Fill in the blank] % of the tweets were actually written by a bot.Of the tweets that were predicted to be written by a bot, [Fill in the blank] % were actually not be written by bot.Of the tweets that were not predicted to be written by a bot, [Fill in the blank] % were actually written by bot.

A random sample of tweets made by @AucklandUni was obtained. Load the dataset into iNZight Lite using this link and produce relevant summary statistics to answer the questions below. Note: When you are using two categorical variables, the order you put variables into iNZight Lite does affect the frequency table in the summary so consider this carefully. Give your answers as percentages rounded to one decimal place e.g. 23.1% or 42.0%. What proportion of the tweets were tweeted in the afternoon or evening (PM)?[Fill in the blank] % What proportion of the tweets were tweeted on a Monday?[Fill in the blank] % Of the tweets that were tweeted on a Monday, what proportion were tweeted in the afternoon or evening (PM)?[Fill in the blank] % Of the tweets that were tweeted in the morning (AM), what proportion were tweeted on a Thursday?[Fill in the blank] %

A model was developed to classify whether or not tweets were written by a Twitter bot. The results from using the classification model on 36 tweets are shown below in the confusion matrix.Use the confusion matrix to answer the following questions. Give your answers as percentages rounded to one decimal place e.g. 23.1% or 42.0%.The accuracy of the classification model (PCC) was [Fill in the blank] %.[Fill in the blank] % of the tweets were predicted to be written by a bot.Of the tweets that were not actually written by a bot, [Fill in the blank] % were correctly predicted to not be written by bot.Of the tweets that were not actually written by a bot, [Fill in the blank] % were incorrectly predicted to be written by bot.

更多留学生实用工具

加入我们,立即解锁 海量真题独家解析,让复习快人一步!